Laserfiche WebLink
S E C 0 R <br /> IConceptual Site Model <br /> . Chevron Service Station##9-6171 <br /> March 25, 2005 <br /> Page 12 <br /> 5.0 REMEDIATION <br /> I <br /> Due to the complexity of groundwater contamination beneath the Lincoln Village Shopping <br /> Center(LVSC), it is pertinent to consider two different remediation systems and strategies <br /> 5.1 Hydrocarbon Remediation <br /> To identify the remedial action requirements and to develop remedial objectives, the current <br /> site concentrations are compared to established Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs)for <br /> soil and water quality set forth by the California State Environmental Protection Agency <br /> (Cal/EPA) The required PRGs are summarized in Table 7 <br /> A review of soil hydrocarbon chemistry data from January 1987 to October 2004 indicates <br /> that the petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil are below the established PRGs <br /> for groundwater This would indicate that any vertical residual plume movement to <br /> groundwater is negligible The lateral extent of soil contamination is limited to shallow soils <br /> between 2 and 17 5 ft bgs (Table 4) In addition, soil contamination occurs at a select few <br /> locations onsite B-3, B-5, and WOT-1 (Figure 2) Soil samples collected during well <br />� . installation around the perimeter of the site, MW-12 through MW-14, reported no petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon contamination Two soil samples collected from MW-8, at a depth of 38 5, and <br /> MW-11D, at a depth of 84 ft bgs, reported low concentrations of MtBE and xylenes At the <br /> time of well installation, the soil samples collected were within the saturated zone beneath <br /> the site It is possible that the observed petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations are a direct <br /> result of soil contamination via product transport through groundwater since the other soil <br /> samples collected from shallower depths within these wells reported no detectable <br /> concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Since natural attenuation mechanisms appear <br /> to be stabilizing the plume, there is no need for any additional remediation actions at this <br /> time Moreover, TPI-Ig and BTEX compounds have not been detected in any of the soil <br /> borings at the site <br /> IIn October 1994, the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons In the groundwater did not <br /> meet the water quality goals established by Cal/EPA (Table 7) Monitoring wells MW-2 and <br /> MW-4 contained concentrations of TPI-Ig at 630 ppb and 2,900 ppb, respectively MW-2 <br /> contained concentrations of benzene at 150 ppb in light of this, a remediation response <br /> plan was established to manage the dissolved hydrocarbon plume and reduce the amount <br /> of hydrocarbons in groundwater The best available technologies (BATS) were soil vapor <br /> extraction (SVE), air sparging (AS), stimulated monitored natural attenuation through <br /> bioreclamation (MNA), vapor phase adsorption using granulated activated carbon (GAC), <br /> and catalytic/thermal oxidation (CTO) Natural attenuation in conjunction with quarterly <br /> sampling was chosen as the best remedial course of action At shallow depths, MNA <br /> controls the migration of the plume and reduces the possibility of deep groundwater <br /> N 1FdeslProiectslChevronlRetad149-81711Site Conceptual ModeI1RNAL_CSM doc <br />