Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> 3-D Model/RD Report Memorandum -2- 14 December 1992 <br /> DDRW, Sharpe <br /> compute recharge for the long-term calibration effort (pages 4-9, 5-3 and 5-16) . <br /> However, actual precipitation values were used for the 1989 to 1991 calibration <br /> period. The initial period for the model was selected using third quarter 1991 data <br /> which represents data collected during the fifth year of drought. This fact was not <br /> acknowledged in the RD Report. It is unclear whether the BC model , which used data <br /> collected and presented in 1985, were verified for the existing drought conditions. <br /> Therefore, I question whether the recharge values assigned to the model domain <br /> accurately reflect existing conditions during the initial time period for the 3-D <br /> model . <br /> Calibration <br /> The 3-D flow model was calibrated for steady state and transient (short- and long- <br /> term) state conditions (pages 5-5, 5-6 and 5-13) . Pumping tests were used for the <br /> short-term transient calibration and ground water fluctuations and declines during <br /> the 1989 to 1991 period were used for the long-term calibration (page 5-14) . My <br /> concern is that the existing data from the Sharpe site were not used to the fullest <br /> for the calibration effort. The RD Report acknowledges that ground water level data <br /> were collected beginning in 1983. Ground water levels continue to be collected by <br /> Sharpe to-date. It is unclear why the complete historical record was not used for <br /> the long-term calibration effort. Ground water levels from 1983 to 1992 would have <br /> reflected both pre-drought and current drought conditions as well as the seasonal <br /> variations that were simulated for the long-term transient state calibration. <br /> Design Objective <br /> The design objectives for the solute transport modeling included preventing the <br /> migration of the 5 microgram per liter (µg/1 ) trichloroethylene (TCE) contour <br /> beyond Roth Road to the north of the site and monitor well cluster 510 to the west. <br /> These objectives were referred to as plume containment (page 8-8) . Data from Second <br /> Quarter 1992 (April to June) show the TCE and total volatile organic constituent <br /> (VOC) concentrations to be as follows: <br /> Well Concentration (µg/1 ) Well Concentration (µg/1 ) <br /> TCE Total VOCs TCE Total VOCs <br /> Inside of 521A 12.0 13. 10 509A <0.5 <0.5 <br /> 5 µg/l 5218 3.16 4.77 509B 0.83 18.21 <br /> Contour 521C 1 .56 3.24 509C 42.0 45.06 <br /> 509CD Not yet sampled <br /> Outside of 505A <0.5 0.75 510A 0.56 2.66 <br /> 5 µg/l 505B 1.2 1.78 5108 <0.5 1 .62 <br /> Contour 505C <0.5 0.72 510C <0.5 0.6 <br /> 505D <0.5 1 . 16 <br /> These data indicate that the concentrations for TCE and total VOCs are generally <br /> less than the aquifer cleanup level for TCE (5 Ag/1 ) at the lateral limits <br /> established (Roth Road and the 510 well cluster) as part of the design objective. <br /> These data may imply one of two things: <br />