Laserfiche WebLink
B. PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR THE FOLLOWINGUAQ RTER: <br /> 1. Submissions to Regulatory Agencies: <br /> (a) Sharpe's Groundwater Treatment System Monthly NPDES Reports <br /> submission (15th day of the month) ; <br /> (b) Interim Draft ROD - July 20, 1992; <br /> (c) Quarterly Progress Report submission - July 30, 1992; <br /> (d) Insitu Vapor Extraction Work Plan - July 17, 1992. <br /> 2. Perform extended Injection Test - August 5, 1992. <br /> 3. Project Manager' s Meeting at DDRW Sharpe. <br /> 4. Continue operating the North and South Balloon Groundwater Treatment <br /> Systems. Connect the remaining new extraction well to North Balloon System. <br /> 5. Submit work plan for Insitu VES and start extended Pilot Test. <br /> C. MANNER AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE TIMETABLES AND DEADLINES ARE BEING <br /> MET. <br /> Reference Page A-2-2 of FFA <br /> Section 12, Consultation of the Aggreement for discussion of review time <br /> periods, response time periods, and consultation procedures. For purposes of <br /> establishing estimated dates, the standard review period of 60 days has been <br /> included for EPA, DTSC, and RWQCB review of each primary document, the <br /> standard response period of 60 days has been in for Sharpe's response, and <br /> the standard 30 days from submittal of the draft final primary document to <br /> finalization of the primary document has been included. Actual consultation <br /> time periods may vary depending upon the factors specified below. <br /> Dates estimated only for purposes of projecting an overall schedule; actual <br /> dates may vary depending on actual document review times of EPA, DTSC, and <br /> RWQCB, and response times of Sharpe, and/or whether or not dispute resolution <br /> is invoked during finalization of the primary document. <br /> D. DECISION MAKING ,RATIONALE WHICH HAS OR WILL IMPACT THE ACTIVITIES <br /> DESCRIBED IN FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT (FFA) <br /> During the Project Manager's Meeting held May 7, 1992 , a change to Soils <br /> FS and ROD was proposed and tentatively agreed to by all parties. Reasons <br /> and rationale for these changes were also discussed. <br /> 1. Recent discovery of PCB/metals contamination in groundwater have <br /> necessitated consideration of groundwater impacts not considered in current <br /> Groundwater ROD. <br />