My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:00:21 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:49:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
533
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jim Pinasco <br /> P;:ge 2 <br /> Section6 2 �age 6-6 It is stated that "QC data that do not meet <br /> established QC requirements will be rejected, and corrective <br /> action. . .will be taken. " What are these established QC <br /> requirements? As stated previously, the QAPP should define <br /> specific QA/QC objectives that must be met and should define <br /> exactly how QA/QC data that do not meet these specific QA/QC <br /> objectives will be used to qualify corresponding environmental <br /> sample data. <br /> Section 7 . 2 In the first paragraph the sentence that reads "a <br /> sample with high background levels" should be changed to read "a <br /> sample with high levels of interferences" . <br /> Section 8 . 1. 5. 1 and Section 8 . 1. 5. 2 Explain the rationale for <br /> not using the percent recovery from actual samples for <br /> purposes. In fact, using percent recoveries from actual samples <br /> Will yield more useful data than using only percent recoveries <br /> from "standard matrix" samples. The moving average percent <br /> recovery is not valid. The percent recovery should be compared <br /> to specific QC requirements and this comparison should be used to <br /> qualify environmental samples in the same lot. <br /> Section 8 . 2 . 1 This section should be rewritten to reflect <br /> comments made in previous section. <br /> Section 8 . 2 . 2 The moving average for accuracy and precision <br /> control is not valid. Accuracy and precision data should be <br /> compared to specific QC requirements and this comparison should <br /> lot. <br /> be used to qualify this <br /> samples in the corresponding <br /> Section 11. 1 Limits for accuracy and precision should be <br /> established prior to the analysis of any samples . <br /> Section 12 . 0 Corrective actions should be defined in relation to <br /> specific QC requirements. <br /> All! � <br /> Neal J. Navarro <br /> Environmental Assessment Unit <br /> Technical Services Unit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.