Laserfiche WebLink
groundwater was conservatively used as the representative concentration. This GEONSATRik <br /> ' evaluation indicates that exposure to residual petroleum constituents present in soil and <br /> groundwater should not pose an unacceptable health risk to hypothetical future on-site <br /> residents under the conditions evaluated. In addition,based on the conservative nature of <br /> ' the PEA evaluation,the presence of residual petroleum constituents in soil and <br /> groundwater should also not pose an unacceptable human health risk to future <br /> commercial and construction workers at the site. In an April 27,2000 letter, DTSC <br /> ' stated that the analytical data were adequate in both quantity and quality and the residual <br /> levels of petroleum-related hydrocarbons in soils are below levels that would constitute <br /> an unacceptable risk to human health and the environment. <br /> ' Results from the investigations summarized in this report do not affect the findings of the <br /> previous human health screening evaluation. Three analytes were detected in <br /> ' groundwater that had not been detected when the risk assessment was performed(toluene <br /> at 0.7µg/1,xylenes at 1.5 µg/1,and phenanthrene at 0.2µg/1). None of these constituents <br /> are carcinogens and,therefore,the calculated theoretical excess cancer risk has not <br /> changed. Geomatrix included these three constituents in a recalculation of the noncancer <br /> hazard index. Because these constituents have nominal non-cancer effects at the <br /> concentrations detected,the newly calculated hazard index remained unchanged at 0.65, <br /> ' indicating that the potential exposure to petroleum at the site should not result in an <br /> adverse non-carcinogenic health effect(U.S.EPA, 1989). <br /> ,. Based on these findings,this site conforms with RWQCB's criteria to be classified and closed as a <br /> low risk site. <br /> 1 <br />