Laserfiche WebLink
GEOMATRIX <br /> Mr. Robert Mihalovich <br /> Chevron Environmental Management Company <br /> July 20, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> laboratory reporting limits in soil samples. TPH quantified as diesel (TPHd) was detected in <br /> grab groundwater samples in May 2000. Analytical results from the October 2000 sampling <br /> event indicated that the following constituents were detected in grab groundwater samples: <br /> TPHd, fluorene (0.3 micrograms per liter [µg/1]), phenanthrene (0.2 gg/1), toluene (0.7 µg/1), <br /> and xylene (1.5 gg/1). Phenanthrene, toluene, and xylenes were not detected above the labo- <br /> ratory reporting limits in previous groundwater samples and fluorene was previously detected <br /> at the same concentration. In accordance with Cal-EPA PEA guidance, the updated screening <br /> health risks presented in this letter are based on the maximum detected concentration for each <br /> constituent. Thus, the three newly detected constituents (phenanthrene, toluene, and xylene) <br /> were added and evaluated as chemicals of potential concern, and the screening human health <br /> risks were recalculated. TPHd was not evaluated because toxicity health criteria do not exist <br /> for TPH mixtures. <br /> Incorporating the May and October 2000 analytical data, the theoretical excess lifetime cancer <br /> risk and the noncancer hazard index for a future adult and child resident did not change be- <br /> cause the concentrations of the newly detected constituents did not contribute significantly to <br /> the overall risks. The lifetime excess cancer risk and the noncancer hazard index are 1x10-6 <br /> and 0.65, respectively. The lifetime excess cancer risk is at the lower end of the acceptable <br /> • risk range of 1x10-6 to 1x10 used by Cal-EPA and U.S. EPA for sites where remediation is <br /> considered. The hazard index is less than 1, indicating that potential exposures to petroleum <br /> constituents at the site should not result in an adverse noncarcinogenic health effect. The up- <br /> dated revised risk calculations are presented in Attachment 3. <br /> In summary, based on the new analytical data, the screening risk evaluation indicates that <br /> potential exposures to petroleum constituents in soil and groundwater should not pose an <br /> unacceptable health risk to hypothetical future residential receptors under the conditions <br /> evaluated. In addition, based on the conservative nature of the PEA evaluation, the presence <br /> of residual petroleum constituents in soil and groundwater should not pose an unacceptable <br /> human health risk to future commercial and construction workers at the site. <br /> If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance,please do not hesitate to call. <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC. <br /> Robert H. CheunG R. Foote R.G. <br /> g �'Y <br /> Senior Toxicologist Senior Geologist <br /> ncc/grf/pp <br /> \\sf3\deptdata\Project\7000s\7243\update risk Itr-Burns-Ridgeway.doc <br /> Attachments 1 through 3 <br /> cc: Penny Fottrell, Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. <br />