Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Dink Mather <br /> March 14, 2000 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • 4. Geomatrix reports petroleum related hydrocarbons at depths from 8.5 to 12.5 feet bgs. <br /> Earth Systems Consultants reports petroleum related constituents down to 15 feet bgs. <br /> Borings EB-7 and EB-9 are in close proximity to GMX-7 and GMX-6 respectively. However, <br /> the results of the soil analysis are dissimilar. Can these data be explained? The lateral ex- <br /> tent of the contamination appears to be adequately addressed. <br /> 5. The grab groundwater sample was not analyzed for TPH gas or diesel yet it was analyzed <br /> for BTEX and PAHs. Please explain the logic of this decision. <br /> 6. Geomatrix uses the environmental data from Earth Systems Consultants in the risk assess- <br /> ment yet the data is not provided in the data summary provided in Appendix B. If the data <br /> are to be used in the risk assessment, copies should be included in the Appendix for <br /> HERD's review. The Earth Systems data are clearly the highest reported detections at the <br /> property. <br /> 7. HERD reproduced the risk calculations. The hazard index was less than 0.4 and the theo- <br /> retical excess cancer risk was approximately 1 x 10-6. Both of these risk levels are at or be- <br /> low acceptable risk ranges. <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> There are several discrepancies in the document that need to be addressed. The issue of the <br /> location of the former Mohawk Gas Station and its contribution to site contamination versus the <br /> • former Old Valley Pipeline requires clarification. HERD recommends that Figure 2 and the text <br /> revised appropriately. The vertical extent of contamination within the two "plumes" requires <br /> clarification. HERD recommends that the analytical data supporting the Earth Systems investi= <br /> gation be included in Appendix B. HERD recommends that the qualitative OVA data presented <br /> in the Boring Logs are included in the text to explain the vertical extent of petroleum related hy- <br /> drocarbon contamination. <br /> The residual levels of petroleum-related hydrocarbons in the soils at the site are below levels <br /> that would constitute an unacceptable risk to human health and the environment as evidenced <br /> by a cancer risk of less than 1 x 10-6 and a hazard index of less than 1.0. Once the document is <br /> appropriately revised, HERD can support a request for no further action for the property. <br /> Please contact me at [(916) 327-2510] or e-mail at dberry@dtsc.ca.gov if you have any ques- <br /> tions regarding the evaluation of the above document. <br /> Reviewed by: Stephen DiZio, Ph.D. <br /> Senior Toxicologist, HERD <br /> • <br />