Laserfiche WebLink
y I/� <br /> GEOMATRIX <br /> The subsurface soil in the project area is predominantly silt and clay, with isolated sandy <br /> lenses,to a depth of at least 25 feet. The water table is approximately 11 feet bgs. It should be <br /> r. noted that shallow groundwater beneath the project area is prohibited for use as domestic or <br /> municipal supply by the City of Tracy Municipal Code (Section 11.1.16) for reasons unrelated <br /> to the presence of degraded crude oil. <br /> The potential health risk posed by the residual petroleum constituents detected in soil and <br /> r <br /> groundwater at the sites were evaluated based on the methodology presented in the Human <br /> Health Screening Evaluation of the PEA; a detailed description of these evaluations were <br /> ' presented in previously cited reports prepared by Geomatrix. The PEA evaluation consists of a <br /> compilation of methods, models, and assumptions commonly used by California and United <br /> States Environmental Protection Agencies (Cal-EPA and U.S. EPA)to quantify human health <br /> risk and hazard at a site. The PEA evaluation is intended to provide conservative estimates of <br /> the theoretical excess lifetime cancer risk and noncancer hazard index based on reasonable <br /> maximum exposure in a residential setting. The theoretical excess lifetime cancer risk for an <br /> adult and child resident is.l x 10"6 for both sites; this value is at the lower end of the acceptable <br /> risk range of 1x10-6 to 1x10 used by Cal-EPA and U.S. EPA for sites where remediation is <br /> considered(CCR Division 4.5, Title 22 §67500.15 and U.S. EPA, 1990). The noncancer <br /> hazard index for an adult and child resident is 0.37 and 0.65 for the Pombo and Burns sites, <br /> respectively; these values are less than 1, indicating that the predicted exposure to petroleum <br /> �. constituents detected on the sites should not result in an adverse noncarcinogenic health effect <br /> (U.S. EPA, 1989). Therefore, the presence of residual petroleum constituents in soil and <br /> groundwater at the sites does not pose an unacceptable human health risk to hypothetical future <br /> residents, under the conditions evaluated. In addition,based on the conservative nature of the <br /> PEA evaluation, the presence of residual petroleum constituents in soil and groundwater should <br /> also not pose an unacceptable human health risk to future commercial and construction <br /> workers. <br /> 3.0 SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> This management plan is intended to describe options for handling the soil affected by <br /> degraded crude oil/Bunker C oil if it is excavated during construction or when placing/repairing <br /> �.. belowgrade utilities. The areas where oil-affected soil was encountered during previous <br /> investigations are shown on Figure 2. <br /> l <br /> +r <br /> \\sf3\deptdata\Doc_Safe\6000s\6115.014\SMP.doc 3 <br /> V <br />