Laserfiche WebLink
1.3 Agency Discussions <br /> A meeting was held September 19, 2000 between WO&S's Jeff Hopkins, PHSIEHD's .teff <br /> Wong and Dot Lofstrom and D K Barber P E &Associates' Dan Barber The PHS/EHD <br /> representatives said that they could not accept the contention that the "shallow water" body <br /> was isolated from the deeper groundwater table, additional definition of any groundwater <br /> contamination was necessary and that the mass of contamination if left in situ would have <br /> to be better defined to estimate any long term impact or risk i <br /> PHSIEHD stated in its September 22, 2000 letter to the owner, WO&S, that a monitoring <br /> well with a full season of sampling is required as part of the groundwater contamination <br /> investigation, 3 additional borings utilizing direct push technology (DPT) to define the <br /> lateral extent of the groundwater contamination, the extension of one of the 3 DPT borings <br /> and collection of a grab groundwater sample, implied collection from the "shallow water <br /> body" 30 feet below surface grade (bsg) and that the work be implemented no later than <br /> November 15, 2000 Reference Appendix F, Comments to WO&S from PHSIEHD <br /> ' A brief addendum to the two earlier proposed work plans was submitted to PHSIEHD by <br /> Dan Barber, October 11, 2000 Upon receipt of the brief addendum Jeff Wong contacted <br /> Dan Barber and stated the addendum was lacking expected information This was followed <br /> with a fax from Wong to Barber on October 13, 2000 Reference Appendix F This work <br /> ' plan of October 17, 2000, addresses those areas of concern and looks more specifically at <br /> protocols and safety plan requirements for the Acampo Plant site <br /> 1.4 Phase II Plan Development <br /> The Phase II definition stage has several objectives <br /> The objectives of this workplan are to <br /> (1) carryout onsite activities in a safe and agreed logical order <br /> (2) complete soil characterization at the site to support further remediation or risk <br /> based decisions <br /> (3) characterize shallow groundwater at the site to support further remediation or <br /> risk based decisions <br /> (4) achieve closure of the site in a timely, economically defendable method <br /> 1-3 <br /> 1 <br />