Laserfiche WebLink
ler <br /> Previously MW No 3 was suspect as the lid had been removed and the casing <br /> ' plug was not in place at the March 26th sampling It may be noted that the <br /> previous quarterly readings of MW No 3 were as low as 0 19 mg/Itr in September <br /> t 2003, 0 39 mglltr in December 2003 and the suspect 0 58 mg/ltr in March 2004 <br /> Contamination levels in this well were 0 31 during this quarterly sampling <br /> (December 2004) <br /> In an effort to establish a "clean line" further out from the source, CPT bonngs were <br /> carried out in November 2003 followed by the second round reported herewith On <br /> ' May 28, 2004, nine new holes were pushed using a CPT rig to ground water to <br /> sample outlying groundwater to determine if the new sampling points were <br /> beyond the underground hydrocarbon plume Results varied between <0 062 <br /> ' mglltr and 0 150 mglltr at the westernmost point 55 FT north of MW 3 <br /> Groundwater contamination between 50 to 55 FT bgs exists Excepting the just <br /> ' noted 0150 mglitr north of MW 3, diminishing or non-detect hydrocarbon <br /> contamination was found north of the site's property during the May CPT borings <br /> While a ND defining the leading edge was not found, most recent CPT borings <br /> ' located further out from the source were less than 0 078 mglltr The original <br /> underground storage tanks (USTs) suspected source has been removed The <br /> closest operating offsite down gradient well is at least 600 FT away Residual <br /> Nshallow soil contamination, possibly contributing to the ground water <br /> contamination has been identified and removal of a portion not covered by <br /> structures may be anticipated <br /> ' Removal of shallow contaminated soil wasro osed in the 12 August 2004 work <br /> P P g <br /> ' plan for Fall 2004 However, upon discussion with your agency WOS agreed to <br /> further characterization in the field north of the site CPT and hydropunch <br /> methodology will be employed in an attempt to define the plume's leading edge <br /> ' and characterize any threat posed to neighboring property shallow domestic <br /> wells While we were hopeful to perform the CPT work this fall it could not be <br /> started prior the beginning of the wet season Work has been postponed until <br /> ' the field area has dried enough to construct access to the anticipated boring <br /> locations CPT work is tentatively anticipated in May 2005 Trenching, by WOS, <br /> in the area between MW No 2 (east fence line and the concrete block wall <br /> t secondary containment area between MW's No 1 and No 6 in November 2004 <br /> revealed soil contamination The findings are discussed in the attached report <br /> and its ATTACHMENT 8, FIELD INVESTIGATION SHALLOW SOIL, 22 <br /> ' November 2004 Access to this area is important to WOS for material handling at <br /> the Acampo facility <br /> A summary of all ground water sampling events is included REFERENCE <br /> ATTACHMENT 2, SUMMARY OF LAB RESULTS included with the report <br />