Laserfiche WebLink
section A-B) This zone is distinguished by exceptionally low friction ratio (Rf), ranging from 0 3 to <br /> 0 6 % in the lower portion in some borings (e g CPT-1, 42-54 feet) This low ratio is due to a <br /> combination of the low sleeve friction (fs) (lack of clayey, cohesive sediment) and the high cone <br /> bearing (qt) (due to the presence of gravel and coarse sand) The friction ratio rises to approximately <br /> 2% upward through the zone, which corresponds to the upward-fining texture of this sand body as <br /> described in previous reports <br /> Overlying and underlying the Modesto Channel are finer-grained stratigraphic units that are <br /> characterized by lower cone beartng, higher sleeve friction and pore pressure, and higher friction <br /> ratio Over most of the site the upper zone is relatively uniform in thickness (30 feet) but the lower <br /> zone varies from more than 30 feet in CPT-6 to as little as 5 feet in CPT-1 This is due to erosion at <br /> the base of the Modesto Channel The lower zone has been referred to as the Modesto Aquitard, <br /> and it represents the initial fine-grained deposition of glacial outwash during the glacial stage that <br /> succeeded the Riverbank interglacial stage (soil-fonriing episode) Foot-by-foot calculations of the <br /> permeability by Gregg In-Situ yield values of 10"5 cm/sec or less for the aquitards and values of 10"2 <br /> to 104 cm/sec for the Modesto Channel (Appendix A) These values are in excellent agreement <br /> with those determined by ASTM lab methods, as reported in the 1996 Problem Assessment Report <br /> Two sand bodies can be correlated within the Riverbank Formation in the site area, and a third body <br /> may be present in the deepest borings (CPT-1 and GT-11, cross section D-E) The upper body <br /> labeled 1" Riverbank Channel, is fairly uniform in thickness (10 feet or less), but it thins and <br /> apparently pinches out south of the Gillies-Bardot property Iine and is not present in CPT-5 (cross <br /> section A-B) It is thickest in GT-6, and appears to be eroded slightly into the underlying aquitaid in <br /> . this well (cross section F-G) The lower sand body, labeled 2"d Riverbank Channel, is thicker than <br /> the upper one and also varies more from north to south Both of these channel deposits have higher <br /> friction ratios than the Modesto Channel and exhibit less upward increase in this ratio, primarily <br /> due to their lower cone bearing (indicating that these sand bodies are finer-grained, contain less <br /> gravel, and do not fine upward as much as the Modesto Channel) <br /> The aquitard that separates these two channels has very high sleeve friction (8-15 tons/f,2), whereas <br /> other units have sleeve friction values of 1-6 The high sleeve friction may tori espond to the <br /> presence of cement (hardpan) in this aquitard Extremely low permeabilities (10-15 cm/sec) were <br /> calculated in several CPT borings (Appendix A) <br /> Little is known about the possible 3`d Riverbank Channel It is recognized primarily in GT-11, <br /> where fine-to-medium-grained sand was sampled from 110 to 120 feet This bed may in fact be <br /> older than the Riverbank Formation, because it is overlain by red clay that records an earlier soil- <br /> forining event It is worth noting that pore pressure increases below the 2nd Riverbank Channel and <br /> sleeve fraction is also higher and more variable than above it, while cone bearing is somewhat <br /> lower Based on these parameters, Gregg In-Situ interpreted this sediment to be finer-grained than <br /> the material above it(Appendix A) <br /> 3.2 Depth to Groundwater <br /> Table 1 provides all depth-to-groundwater measurements and calculated groundwater elevations <br /> The depth increased throughout much of 2003, but rose slightly between September and December <br /> 4 <br />