My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006043
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
3931
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540573
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2020 2:40:29 PM
Creation date
4/8/2020 4:11:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006043
RECORD_ID
PR0540573
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023207
FACILITY_NAME
GILLIES TRUCKING INC
STREET_NUMBER
3931
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13207017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3931 NEWTON RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
when the static water level <br /> uses above the Riverbank Formation into the basal Modesto Formation, <br /> and then gradually decline as the water level recedes below the Modesto-Riverbank contact during <br /> dry seasons or years Concentrations do not increase when the water level drops below the Modesto <br /> Formation into the Riverbank Formation, because soil within the Riverbank is largely <br /> uncontaminated <br /> 6.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> From the data that have been collected at this site since 1994, we can draw several conclusions <br /> regarding the scope of the contaminant problem, as listed below <br /> 1) The principal contaminant of concern is diesel fuel In soil samples, maximum diesel <br /> concentrations have ranged from 10,000 to 20,000 parts per million, which is <br /> approximately 20 tunes greater than maximum gasoline concentrations In groundwater <br /> samples (excluding hydropunch samples, which are notoriously inaccurate), maximum <br /> diesel concentrations have ranged from 50,000 to 200,000 ppb (in GT-10 only), which is <br /> between 100 and 400 times greater than gasoline concentrations in some cases Further, the <br /> maximum methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether(MTBE) concentration in any sample has been 8 parts <br /> per billion, and the maximum benzene concentration has never exceeded 20 parts per <br /> billion <br /> 2) A large proportion of the diesel fuel was removed by overexcavation of the former UST <br /> cavity in 1989 However, approximately 7,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil are <br /> estimated to still be present beneath the former tank cavity at depths that are beyond the <br /> reach of excavation equipment Contamination starts at a depth of 35 feet (base of the <br /> excavation) and extends to a depth of 70 feet directly below the former UST cavity <br /> Laterally, the contamination dissipates at shallower depths, depending on the depth to the <br /> base of the Modesto channel In most places, diesel fuel migrated downward through this <br /> permeable channel until it encountered the impermeable silt and clay that underlies the <br /> channel, and the hydrocarbons became bound up in the soil above and below the contact <br /> between these two deposits Throughout the impacted area,this contact occurs at a depth of <br /> less than 55 feet, and contamination is therefore largely confined to the interval 40-60 feet <br /> 3) Few options for remediation of this soil are available Diesel fuel is not amenable to soil <br /> vapor extraction because of its low volatility Further, a significant proportion(30-50%?) of <br /> the contaminants are locked up within impermeable silt and clay beds, which are not <br /> amenable to any type of vapor treatment, regardless of the nature of the contaminant <br /> Limited investigation of the abundance of soil microbes was conducted in 1996 to assess <br /> the potential for natural attenuation by biological activity, and the results were not <br /> encouraging Hence, the relatively low health risks posed by diesel fuel at this depth may <br /> not warrant the expenditure of considerable sums of public money to reduce contaminant <br /> concentrations <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.