Laserfiche WebLink
when the static water level <br /> uses above the Riverbank Formation into the basal Modesto Formation, <br /> and then gradually decline as the water level recedes below the Modesto-Riverbank contact during <br /> dry seasons or years Concentrations do not increase when the water level drops below the Modesto <br /> Formation into the Riverbank Formation, because soil within the Riverbank is largely <br /> uncontaminated <br /> 6.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> From the data that have been collected at this site since 1994, we can draw several conclusions <br /> regarding the scope of the contaminant problem, as listed below <br /> 1) The principal contaminant of concern is diesel fuel In soil samples, maximum diesel <br /> concentrations have ranged from 10,000 to 20,000 parts per million, which is <br /> approximately 20 tunes greater than maximum gasoline concentrations In groundwater <br /> samples (excluding hydropunch samples, which are notoriously inaccurate), maximum <br /> diesel concentrations have ranged from 50,000 to 200,000 ppb (in GT-10 only), which is <br /> between 100 and 400 times greater than gasoline concentrations in some cases Further, the <br /> maximum methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether(MTBE) concentration in any sample has been 8 parts <br /> per billion, and the maximum benzene concentration has never exceeded 20 parts per <br /> billion <br /> 2) A large proportion of the diesel fuel was removed by overexcavation of the former UST <br /> cavity in 1989 However, approximately 7,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil are <br /> estimated to still be present beneath the former tank cavity at depths that are beyond the <br /> reach of excavation equipment Contamination starts at a depth of 35 feet (base of the <br /> excavation) and extends to a depth of 70 feet directly below the former UST cavity <br /> Laterally, the contamination dissipates at shallower depths, depending on the depth to the <br /> base of the Modesto channel In most places, diesel fuel migrated downward through this <br /> permeable channel until it encountered the impermeable silt and clay that underlies the <br /> channel, and the hydrocarbons became bound up in the soil above and below the contact <br /> between these two deposits Throughout the impacted area,this contact occurs at a depth of <br /> less than 55 feet, and contamination is therefore largely confined to the interval 40-60 feet <br /> 3) Few options for remediation of this soil are available Diesel fuel is not amenable to soil <br /> vapor extraction because of its low volatility Further, a significant proportion(30-50%?) of <br /> the contaminants are locked up within impermeable silt and clay beds, which are not <br /> amenable to any type of vapor treatment, regardless of the nature of the contaminant <br /> Limited investigation of the abundance of soil microbes was conducted in 1996 to assess <br /> the potential for natural attenuation by biological activity, and the results were not <br /> encouraging Hence, the relatively low health risks posed by diesel fuel at this depth may <br /> not warrant the expenditure of considerable sums of public money to reduce contaminant <br /> concentrations <br /> 7 <br />