Laserfiche WebLink
• GT-7, creating multiple groundwater flow directions This is an unstable condition, and normally <br /> the water level would flatten out and become more uniform over such a small area,yielding a single <br /> flow direction The likely reason that the water level has not been able to equilibrate�is that the low <br /> permeability of the clay and silt bed from 40-60 feet has retarded groundwater movement up or <br /> down to a more uniform level <br /> In comparison to most other sites, the groundwater gradient beneath the Gillies Trucking facility <br /> has been highly variable This subject was addressed in the First Quarter 1999 Report, in which <br /> several different interpretations of the groundwater flow direction were illustrated Over the years, <br /> there have been substantial seasonal variations in both flow direction and gradient, making it <br /> difficult to identify the predominant flow direction or the primary controls on groundwater flow <br /> 4,3 Analytical Results <br /> Diesel was detected in three of the monitoring wells (Table 2) The concentration in GT-10 is <br /> considerably higher than in the recent past, but this is probably because the well was not purged <br /> because of the low water level in the well It is likely that diesel has collected at the bottom of the <br /> well as the water level declined Had the well been purged, the water level may not have recovered <br /> sufficiently to allow sampling The concentration was also higher in GT-6, perhaps because the <br /> static water level has now fallen and is within the screened interval of this well When the level was <br /> above 55 feet, samples were collected below the soil-water interface and may therefore have been <br /> slightly less contaminated In the same way, the low concentration (89 parts per billion—ppb) in <br /> GT-I may be indicative of concentrations below the soil-water interface in this well <br /> • Light-weight hydrocarbons in the gasoline range were again detected in GT-10, but concentrations <br /> are low relative to diesel Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline were reported at a <br /> concentration of 920 ppb, while benzene and ethylbenzene were detected at less than 7 ppb Xylene <br /> and toluene may also be present, but the concentration is less than 1 ppb, and both compounds were <br /> present in GT-1 at about this concentration <br /> 5.0 SUMMARY OF EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION <br /> In previous reports, maps and dross sections have been presented to illustrate the lateral and vertical <br /> extent of soil contamination Maps have also been prepared showing the lateral extent of <br /> groundwater contamination In this section,this information is summarized and brought up to date <br /> 5.1 Vertical Extent <br /> Figure 5 is a graph of diesel concentration versus depth in three borings that are located in the <br /> immediate vicinity of the former UST facility All three borings penetrated the base of the Modesto <br /> aquifer channel between 50 and 54 feet, and the graphs illustrate that diesel concentrations increase <br /> rapidly downward through the channel from less than 2000 ppm to more than 15,000 ppm at the <br /> base of the channel In most borings, concentrations decline dramatically below the base of the <br /> channel and are near zero in the underlying Riverbank Formation, but a few samples between 60 <br /> and 70 feet in GT-8, GT-11, and GT-3 contained diesel fuel at concentrations of 700-5500 ppm, <br /> • <br /> 4 <br />