My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006044
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
3931
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540573
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2020 2:32:59 PM
Creation date
4/8/2020 4:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006044
RECORD_ID
PR0540573
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023207
FACILITY_NAME
GILLIES TRUCKING INC
STREET_NUMBER
3931
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13207017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3931 NEWTON RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
View images
View plain text
{� The calculated water table elevations were used to construct the groundwater gradient map in <br /> Figure 3 There is an east-trending depression in the water table that trends toward well GT-10 <br /> However, the static water level is slightly elevated in this well, forming a slight mound in the center <br /> of the depression The predominant flow direction appears to be eastward <br /> In comparison to most other sites, the groundwater gradient beneath the Gillies Trucking facility <br /> has been highly variable during the seven years during which we have constructed gradient maps <br /> This subject was addressed in the First Quarter 1999 Report, in which several different <br /> interpretations of the groundwater flow direction were illustrated Over the years, there have been <br /> substantial seasonal variations in both flow direction and gradient, making it difficult to identify the <br /> predominant flow direction or the primary controls on groundwater flow <br /> 3.2 Analytical Results <br /> Diesel was detected in three of the monitoring wells and in the Gillies domestic well (G-1) (Table <br /> 2) The,concentration has increased since December 2000 in GT-I and GT-10,but declined in GT- <br /> 6 This continues a pattern of fluctuating concentrations from quarter to quarter The increase in <br /> GT-10 follows a sharp decrease in December In the Fourth Quarter 2000 Report, we hypothesized <br /> that the December decrease was probably not sustainable, and the March results confirm this The <br /> results also confirm our suggestion in an earlier report that purged wells do not necessarily yield <br /> contaminant concentrations that are greater or more valid than non-purged wells This is probably <br /> especially true of diesel, which has low volatility However, it is also notable that the benzene, <br /> Ethylbenzene, and xylene concentrations in GT-10 also increased in March All of these <br /> compounds are more volatile than diesel, yet they did not degrade to lower concentrations than <br /> were detected after purging the wells in December It is particularly significant that diesel was <br /> detected in G-1, even though we did not purge the holding tank before cQllecting a sample <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> The groundwater gradtent and flow direction continue to fluctuate over a large range of compass <br /> directions A northward flow direction has been measured during the first quarter in more than one <br /> year, but this was not the case during the first quarter of 2001, when an eastward or northeastward <br /> direction was apparent The flow pattern is complex and variable, and the main factors controlling it <br /> are ambiguous - <br /> In the 3rd Quarter 2000 Report, we concluded that purging has little effect on contaminant <br /> concentrations, because concentrations were quite similar to those during the second quarter, even <br /> though the wells were not purged in the tlurd quarter, In the fourth quarter, a slight increase from <br /> non.-detect to 100 parts per billion was noted in GT-1 and GT-5 that might have been attributable to <br /> the effects of purging in the fourth quarter The results from the first quarter of 2001, however, <br /> show that purging has little, if any, effect on contaminant concentrations Therefore, we recommend <br /> reducing the frequency of purging in the future This will reduce equipment, manpower, and <br /> disposal costs but will not adversely affect the laboratory results Purging could be done on an <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).