Laserfiche WebLink
• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> P <br /> Two borings were drilled at the Gillies Trucking yard in the first quarter of 1999 One way drilled to <br /> a depth of 120 feet, and one was drilled to 60 feet and completed as a 4-inch by 25-foot will for use <br /> in monitoring and feasibility testing Sixteen soil samples were analyzed for TPH-die 3el, TPH- <br /> gasoline, BTEX, and MTBE. Diesel was detected in 12 of the samples, gasoline, ethylberaene, and <br /> xylene were detected in 8, and benzene and toluene were detected in 1 A maximlim diesel <br /> concentration of 19,000 ppm was detected at 57 5 feet The maximum depth of confirmed <br /> contamination was 71 feet,where a diesel concentration of 740 ppm and a gasoline concei itration of <br /> 34 ppm were reported The results confirm the 1990 data from boring TB-2, which indicated that <br /> contamination extends to approximately 70 feet The new data are consistent with the into rpretation <br /> presented in the 1996 Problem Assessment Report that contamination is largely contair ed within <br /> the lower portion of the Modesto Formation aquifer sand, but extends into the underlyin; aquitard <br /> and locally through it into the upper part of the Riverbank Formation aquifer <br /> The depth to groundwater was measured after the newest well was installed, and water samples <br /> were collected from all seven monitor wells Groundwater has now risen from a depth )f 85 feet <br /> when the first well was drilled in 1990 to a depth of 46 feet As a result, groundwater is nc w present <br /> within the lower part of the Modesto aquifer, where diesel concentrations in excess of 15,000 ppm <br /> have been measured in soil samples Hence, groundwater has become further contarr inated by <br /> contact with this residual source, and five of seven water samples contained ietectable <br /> concentrations of diesel We had previously warned of the potential for such an in crease in <br /> . groundwater contamination in our first report on this site (1994) The newest well is loi ated near <br /> the center of the contaminant plume, and diesel (190,000 ppb), gasoline (1,800 ppb), bei,zene (6 8 <br /> ppb), toluene (0 51 ppb), ethylbenzene (6 6 ppb), xylene (8 7 ppb), and MTBE (9 7 ppb) were all <br /> detected in water from this well The depth to water in the well was anomalously low hy several <br /> hundredths of a foot, and was inconsistent with previous interpretations of the groundv,ater flow <br /> direction Therefore, as a further check on this anomaly, all wells were re-surveyed ,nd water <br /> depths were re-measured two weeks after the well was installed This did not resolve the anomaly, <br /> with the addition of the new well to the data base, the groundwater gradient and flow direr tion have <br /> become even more complex than previously thought, and cannot be uniquely determir rd at this <br /> time <br /> A receptor well survey was also performed during the first quarter The well files of the California <br /> Department of Water Resources were reviewed, followed by a dnve-by inspection of nc ighboring <br /> properties More than 30 domestic, irrigation, and industrial wells were found within a ?,000-foot <br /> radius of the site All are located north, east, or south of the Gillies property Perforated intervals <br /> and other important data are sparse, but some of the wells appear to be producing water from the <br /> Riverbank or underlying Turlock Lake formations at depths of 150 feet or more <br />