My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011924
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
3931
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540573
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2020 2:40:29 PM
Creation date
4/9/2020 2:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011924
RECORD_ID
PR0540573
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023207
FACILITY_NAME
GILLIES TRUCKING INC
STREET_NUMBER
3931
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13207017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3931 NEWTON RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
disposable plastic bailers and transferred to 1-liter amber bottles, then labeled and placed into a <br /> • cooled ice chest for later transport to the laboratory All samples were analyzed for TPH-diesel The <br /> laboratory report is contained in Appendix D and a summary of these data is in Table 3 <br /> 2.3 Mass Balance Calculations <br /> The soil analytical data were transferred to Table 4 and used to construct new contour maps of <br /> diesel concentrations The maps were constructed by using the mean concentration for each 5-foot <br /> sample interval The mean was approximated by averaging the concentrations at the top and bottom <br /> of each interval For example, the mean concentration for the 35-40 depth interval in boring GT-22 <br /> determined from Table 4 is <br /> (3,480 mg/kg + 1,560 mg/kg)—2=5,040 mg/kg--2 =2,520 mg/kg <br /> i <br /> In some borings, samples were collected at 10-foot intervals In these cases, the upper/and lower <br /> sample were averaged to estimate the concentration at the mid-point between samples, and then this <br /> calculated concentration was then used to calculate the mean concentration lin the intervals above <br /> and below it Boring GT-23 provides an example <br /> The concentration at 60 feet is estimated from the concentrations at 55 and 65 feet <br /> (1 3 mg/kg+ 9 25 mg/kg)— 2 = 10 55 mg/kg T 2 = 5 mg/kg <br /> Hence, the mean concentration between 55 and 60 feet is <br /> • <br /> (13 mg/kg+ 52m g) -2 = 3mg/kg <br /> In those cases where the sample at either the top or bottom of the interval was reported as Non- <br /> detect (below the 1 mg/kg detection limit), the mean concentration for the interval was determined <br /> by adding the other concentration to 0 and dividing by 2 <br /> Mean concentration data were then contoured to map the extent of soil contamination All maps <br /> plotted the 10, 500, 1,000, and 5,000 mg/kg contours, and for some maps the 10,000 and 15,000 <br /> contours were also drawn However, because the area within the 10,000 and 15,000-foot contours <br /> was small, these contours are not shown on the final drafted maps in this report <br /> After the maps were generated, the volume of gasoline within each depth interval was computed <br /> AutoCADQ automatically measured the area between contour lines at each depth honzon (35 feet, <br /> 40 feet, etc) For example, in Table 4, the 5,000 mg/kg contour line at a depth of 35 feet <br /> encompasses approximately 95 square feet Because the hydrocarbon plume spreads outward with <br /> depth, this same contour line encompasses 540 square feet at a depth of 40 feet Hence, an <br /> approximate estimate of the volume of soil between the top and bottom of this depth interval is <br /> Vsoil = [(95 ft2+ 540 ft2)— 2] x 5 ft= 1,588 ft' <br /> 3 <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.