Laserfiche WebLink
k <br /> The new wells force extensive revision of the isopach map for the 3`d Riverbank aquifer In the <br /> November 2004 Fourth Quarter Report we postulated a west-trending channel from GT-6 through <br /> the former UST cavity toward GT-13, where the thickness of this aquifer reaches 15 feet The map <br /> predicted that the aquifer thins northward toward GT-15 and CPT-6 and would die out before <br /> reaching GT-12 and GT-18 Instead, both wells penetrated 3rd Riverbank sand at a depth of 120 feet <br /> and were terminated in flus sand at 125 feet (Appendix A) This suggests that this channel trends <br /> more southwesterly from the truck repair garage toward GT-13 and GT-2 (Figure 9) Both Figure 3 <br /> and Figure 5 are transverse to the postulated channel axis, which is shown passing between CPT-2 <br /> and GT-15 in Figure 3 and beneath GT-7 in Figure 5 Boring CPT-1 (depth 130 feet) is the only <br /> boring that completely penetrated the 3rd Riverbank Channel and reached the underlying aquitard, <br /> but lacking samples it is uncertain whether the channel overlies a paleosol (as shown in Figure 4) of <br /> unweathered sediment (as shown in Figure 5) However, a few inches of mottled reddish-blown silt <br /> were penetrated at the bottom of GT-13 at a depth of 127 feet, supporting the suggestion of a <br /> paleosol below the channel (see boring log of GT-13, Appendix A,Fourth Quarter 2004 Report) <br /> 7 <br /> k <br /> 3.2 Paleosols <br /> Weathered deposits interpreted as paleosols were recognized as early as 1990 at this site, when <br /> Richesin and Associates drilled GT-3 (termed MW-1 in their report) These ancient soils have been <br /> consistently recognized in all borings and used as excellent stratigraphic markers in correlating <br /> from boring to boring throughout Upgradient Environmental's investigation Brief descriptions <br /> have been given in various reports, and here we provide a more thorough discussion of the <br /> characteristics of these marker units and interpretation of their significance <br /> Several features of these units make them readily distinguishable from unweathered deposits of the <br /> Riverbank and Modesto Formations Color is the most obvious criterion for recognizing paleosols <br /> Where unweathered, the deposits are gray to dark gray(sand) or light gray to pale tan (silt and clay) <br /> In weathered zones, the sediment is oxidized to reddish-brown or dark brown or is mottled in color <br /> with veins and streaks of white, patches of yellow or red, or blotches of black or bluish black The <br /> white veins are some type of pedogemc precipitate (perhaps calcium carbonate or gypsum) and the <br /> black blotches are either weathered organic material or manganese oxide minerals Examination of <br /> most boring logs will reveal several zones in which the parent material has been discolored by <br /> weathering and soil formation <br /> Another criterion that can be used is the degree of lithification, exemplified by blow counts or the <br /> difficulty of extruding the sediment from the sample tubes Unweathered sand is normally loose and <br /> unconsolidated, and silt is generally moderately consolidated to soft Blow counts in unweathered <br /> sand range from 5 to 15 and in silt from 10 to 30 Where the sediment has been affected by soil- <br /> forming piocesses, the sand may be sufficiently compacted to be difficult to extrude from the <br /> sampler, and silt can be extracted only with difficulty Blow counts increase to more than 20 in sand <br /> beds and more than 50 in silt and clay beds <br /> A third criterion is the development of soil structures (soul peds) Blocky peds are the most easily <br /> recognized in the core samples, but irregular or columnar peds have also been observed Fhe ped <br /> surfaces are characterized by re-sedimented clay (clay skins) that has leached downward from <br /> 5 <br />