Laserfiche WebLink
and 7 1 parts per million in the 3rd Riverbank aquifer, were detected Samples I <br /> the mudstone <br /> aquitards that separate these aquifers were below detection limits, except for one sample between <br /> the Modesto and 1St Riverbank aquifers A concentration of 4400 parts per million was detected in <br /> GT-15 As reiterated in many previous reports, a large body of data demonstrates that this aquitard <br /> absorbed a large quantity of diesel fuel and Was the primary constraint limiting the downward <br /> leaching of diesel fuel into underlying aquifers <br /> Monitoring wells were constructed in the 1St, 2nd, and 3`d Riverbank aquifers in various wells Three <br /> wells were installed in the 3rd aquifer, and a groundwater elevation map was derived for this aquifer <br /> using the three-point method A gradient of 0 001 ft/ft was calculated, with groundwater flow to the <br /> south Three wells were also installed in the 2nd aquifer, and the groundwater elevation data from <br /> these wells suggest that groundwater in this aquifer flows westward, at least in the vicinity of the <br /> UST cavity <br /> One well was installed in the 0 <br /> Riverbank aquifer, and water was present at the bottom of well <br /> GT-13A when it was sampled However, data from most wells indicate that this aquifer is currently <br /> above the water table and is within the unsaturated zone Hence, the source of the water in GT-13A <br /> is uncertain and it may be more representative of the 2"d Riverbank aquifer than the 1St aquifer A <br /> groundwater elevation map for the 1St Riverbank aquifer was constructed using data from three of <br /> the previously installed wells and GT-13A, and the contours imply that groundwater is flowing <br /> northward in this aquifer <br /> Thirteen water samples from the 1", 2nd and 3`d Riverbank aquifers were analyzed The Gillies <br /> domestic well continues to be free of hydrocarbons A new well 20 feet to the south had a diesel <br /> concentration of 59 parts per billion in the 2"d Riverbank aquifer, implying that the northern mat gin <br /> of the contaminant plume is between these two wells A sample from a well south of the former <br /> UST cavity was also below the detection limit, helping to delineate the plume in that area In <br /> between these two areas, concentrations ranged from 300 to 600 parts per billion, and the plume <br /> appears to be centered north of the former UST cavity This is fairly consistent with the apparent <br /> direction of groundwater flow in this aquifer <br /> All three water samples from the 3`d Riverbank aquifer were slightly contaminated with diesel <br /> Concentrations of 56 and 72 parts per billion were detected south and west of the UST cavity From <br /> Figure 12, this suggests that the southern margin of the plume is delineated and is cross-gradient to <br /> present groundwater flow A concentration of 390 parts per billion was detected nearer the UST <br /> cavity, and we infer that this plume is located within the immediate vicinity of the UST cavity The <br /> maximum concentration in this aquifer isrelativelylow(probably less than 500 parts per billion) <br /> 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In previous sections of this report, we have made specific recommendations for minor changes in <br /> the next phase of drilling Based on our interpretation of the data collected during this phase, we <br /> recommend drilling wells GT-16 through GT-21 in one additional phase, rather than separating <br /> them into two phases, as originally proposed in the July 2004 work plan Because groundwater <br /> 13 <br />