Laserfiche WebLink
EXXON#7-3942 Page 1 of 2 <br /> And <br /> LTCP Checklist Go GEOTRACKER HOME I MAIJ.G vR re...—....EdBg1111.ga0lQ <br /> OPEN-REMEDIATION <br /> EXXON 97-3942170907700019)-MAP THIS SITE <br /> 4444 PERSHING AVEN AOTNITIFR REPORT CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES <br /> $TQQX7QN,QA 95207 - SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOP(LEAD)-CASE a:2231 <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUOLC WEEPAGE CASEWORKER: KIM ARTN Y-SUPERVISOR.ADRIENNE ELLSAESSER <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY RWQ06(REGION 58)-CASE a:390025 <br /> MEW PRINTaBLE CASESLM' RY FOR THIS SITE CASEWORKER:JAMES SARTON-SUPERVISOR:CORI CONDON <br /> CUP CMIm%:5312 CUF Prarily Assigned:D CUP Amount Paid:f1.490007 <br /> THIS PROJECT WAS LAST MODIFIED BY N AR Neu ReONON 521120142:13:04 PM-HISTORY <br /> TIM SITE Mir SUBMf AW.CLICK ISSIS TO OPEN A NEW WINDOW WITH THE SUBMITTAL APPROVAL PAGE FOR THIS SITE. <br /> CLOSURE POLICY THIS VERSIONS FINAL AS OF 5/21/2014 CM:CKIJST UWMTED ON a0am+3 Cl COURP P01.11of HMTOIW <br /> General Criteria-The site satisfies the policy general criteria-CLEAR s-cTiow ANSWERS NO <br /> a.Is Ne unauthorized release located within the service area of a public waters stem? F, YES ONO <br /> rareof Water System: Calwalef <br /> b.The unauthorized release consists Onty of petroleum ififf m YES r NO <br /> c.The unauthorized('primary)release from the UST system has been stopped. t• YES r NO <br /> d.Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable JjDM, r FP Not Encountered rYES C NO <br /> e.A conceptual site model that assesses the nature,extent,and mobility of the release has been developed Lm. f4' YES r NO <br /> f.Secunda source has been removed to the extent practicable <br /> Impedimemto Removing Secondary Source(Chad,all that Apply): <br /> F Remediation Has Not Been Attempted <br /> F Remediation Was Designed Incomedly C YES t! NO <br /> F Remediation Was Shut Oa Premeh relY <br /> F Poor Remediation O&M <br /> F Other - Vadose zone has beenremadaded dAS�i <br /> g.Soil or groundwater has been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section r Not Required r YES C NO <br /> 25296.15. <br /> h.Does a nuisance exist as defined by Water Code section 13050. r YES is NO <br /> 1.MediaSpecif c Criteria:Groundwater-The contaminantplUme that exceeds water quality objectives is stable or decreasing in area[extent,and NO <br /> meets all of the additional characteristics of one of the five classes of sites listed below.- P.R s eTi P� I�w M CRs <br /> EXEMPTION-Soil Only Case(Release has ILI Affected Groundwater-low C YES n NO <br /> Does the site meet any of the Groundwater specific Criteria scenarios? C YES C NO <br /> ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS-Please Indicate only those conditions that d,not meet the policy criteria: <br /> Plume Length(That Exceeds Water Quality Objectives): <br /> r z 100 Feet and<250 Feet (0 z 250 Feet and<1,000 Feet C a 1,000 Feel r Unknown <br /> Plume is Stable or Decreasing in AREA Extent: <br /> C No r Unknown <br /> Free Product in Groundwater: <br /> C Yes r No r Unknown <br /> Free Product Has Been Removed tothe Maximum Extent Practicable: <br /> C No r Unknown <br /> For sites with free product,the Plume Has Been Stable or Decreasing for 5-Years(info) <br /> r No r Unknown <br /> Forsites with free product,owner Willing to Accepts Land Use Restriction(if required): <br /> C No r Unknown <br /> Free Product Extends Grand <br /> C'Yes r Unknown <br /> Benzene Concentration <br /> r a 1,000 pgll and 13,000 POR Is e 3,0001 r Unknown <br /> MTBE Concentrefies: <br /> C z 1,0011 pgll C Unknown <br /> Nearest Supply Well From Plume Boundary): <br /> r s 250 Fast r>250 Feet and s 1,000 Feet r Unknown <br /> Nearest Surface Water Body(From Plume Boundary); <br /> r s 250 Feet r'>250 Feel and s 1,000 Feet r Unknown <br /> 2.Media Specific Criteria:Petroleum Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air-The site is Considered/ow-Mreetfor the vaporintrusion-Mairpathway i/site- YES <br /> spedfic Conditions satisfy items 2a,2b,or 2c-CL=_.e SECTION ANsweRs <br /> EXEMPTION-Active Commercial Petroleum Fueling Facility C YES C NO <br /> Does the site meet any of the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air specific criteria scenarios? f YES C NO <br /> 2a-Scenario 4(example)Direct Measuremem of Soil Gas Concentrations YES <br /> I,Soil Gas Sampling Locations-No Bioattenualion Zane: YES <br /> https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/screens/closure_lolicy.asp?global_id=TO... 5/21/2014 <br />