Laserfiche WebLink
+� <br /> Eonunu G. Beuwry Jn. <br /> '"Aovfnxan <br /> �ftll- <br /> M.. Rooa..........�Wo <br /> icuez <br /> WaterBoards v `NvIaONMfxfx``xarf`r'°x <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board RECEIVED <br /> 19 May 2014 , ICMA`Y/2 0 20144 <br /> Jennifer Sedlachek ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> ExxonMobil Environmental Services Company PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> 4086 Piedmont Avenue, #199 <br /> Oakland, CA 94611 <br /> NOTICE OF INTENT, FORMER EXXON SERVICE STATION #73942, 4444 PERSHING <br /> AVENUE, STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> On 4 March 2014, Cardino ERI submitted a Notice of Intent (NOI) and supporting technical <br /> information (work plans and reports) to operate under Waste Discharge Requirements of General <br /> Order R5-2008-0149 (General Order) on your behalf for your site at 4444 Pershing Avenue in <br /> Stockton. The NOI describes the proposed injection of PersulfOX(D into groundwater from an <br /> injection system consisting of existing monitoring and remediation wells UVB-MW-1, UVB-MW-2, <br /> V1, V2, V4, SW1, SW2, IP 1B, IP1B, IP2A, IPA26, IP3A, IP36, PSV1, and PSV2, screened from <br /> 12 feet below ground surface (' bgs) to 45' bgs. The injection system has been designed to <br /> oxidize petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants, including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), in <br /> groundwater found between 15'-45' bgs. A bench scale test was conducted in 2006 and involved <br /> injection of a combination of ozone gas and hydrogen peroxide, with removal of resulting fugitive <br /> vapors by the soil vapor extraction system. Rebound occurred within four months, and the ozone <br /> gas and hydrogen peroxide injections were not continued. <br /> The NOI Contingency Plan addressed physical daylighting of the injected product but did not <br /> address potential adverse impacts to groundwater quality including increases in sulfate and total <br /> dissolved solids. The NOI did not include a proposed Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) <br /> which should provide background levels for all constituents of concern and practical quantitation <br /> limits for analyses. The NOI did not show or describe locations for the background sampling, <br /> treatment zone (monitoring, not injection), transition zone or compliance zone wells in alignment <br /> with the requirements for Operating under the General Order. <br /> Please submit a revise NOI by 30 June 2014 addressing a Contingency Plan for <br /> implementation if adverse impacts are observed in compliance wells, a proposed Monitoring <br /> and Reporting Program with map figures identifying the treatment zone monitoring wells, <br /> transition zone monitoring wells , compliance zone and background wells with rationale for their <br /> designation, and PQLs for all constituents analyses. All of the information required in <br /> Attachment B must be addressed including completion of the enclosed CEQA document. An <br /> example of an MRP (Attachment C) can be downloaded with the General Order at: <br /> KARL E. LONGLEY SEE), P.E., CnAIR I PAMELA C. CREEDON P.E., EICEE, EXECunvc orrwcn <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive#200,Rancho Cordova,CA 95670 1 www.waterboards.ca.gov/centra$vall.y <br /> Ir, 1Ar. <br />