Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Jennifer C Sedlachek 24 June 2005 <br /> ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company Page 2 <br /> 40 concentration of vapor phase hydrocarbons Sn <br /> Pari g with nitrogen(an inert gas) also significantly <br /> P P Y <br /> reduced the amount of hydrocarbons in groundwater, but the removal appears to have been due to <br /> volatilization, not destruction of hydrocarbons The volatilization of some hydrocarbons from the <br /> ozone and peroxone tests was expected It should be noted that concentrations of volatilized <br /> hydrocarbons in the field should be lower than in laboratory tests due to sorption, subsequent <br /> oxidation, or biodegradation in the vadose zone, and other factors which could not be reproduced in <br /> laboratory studies <br /> Most water quality parameters were not significantly affected by nitrogen, ozone, or peroxone <br /> treatment when compared to untreated groundwater Constituents that were affected were aluminum, <br /> arsenic, banum, bromide, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, vanadium, and Cr(VI) Of these, <br /> concentrations of arsenic, manganese, and nickel decreased after all three treatments Bromide <br /> decreased after treatment with ozone and peroxone When water that contains bromide is treated with <br /> ozone, a number of oxidation byproducts can be formed, including bromate Although the <br /> concentration of bromide decreased over time during testing,it does not appear that it was converted <br /> to bromate Bromate was not detected above the detection limit of S µg/L in either the ozone or <br /> peroxone tests <br /> Aluminum, barium, molybdenum, vanadium, and Cr(VI) concentrations increased in groundwater <br /> samples in most cases The increase in aluminum concentrations occurred after the nitrogen and <br /> ozone tests(but not the peroxone test) for reasons that are unclear The increased level of aluminum <br /> remained below the California maximum contaminant level (MCL) The concentrations of <br /> molybdenum responded similarly to both nitrogen(an inert gas)and the oxidants, suggesting that the <br /> changes in concentrations were not due to oxidation There is no MCL for molybdenum Barium, <br /> vanadium, and Cr(VI) significantly changed only in the ozone and/or peroxone tests, indicating that <br /> the changes were due to oxidation Ban urn concentrations increased but to levels below the California <br /> MCL Vanadium concentrations increased to 350 gg/L, which exceeds the California State Action <br /> Level for Drinking Water of 50 gg/L There is no MCL for vanadium <br /> Treatment with ozone and peroxone generated Cr(VI),but tests indicate that this Cr(VI)should revert <br /> to Cr(III)upon exposure to untreated soil The amount of Cr(VI)produced varied from <6 µg/L to a <br /> maximum of 570 µg/L The cause of the variability is unknown,but probably is associated with the <br /> amount or concentration of applied ozone and/or the presence of manganese in the soil or <br /> groundwater When present, manganese appears to be oxidized into permanganate (MnOa), which <br /> was present in all tests showing high Cr(VI) concentrations, but not in tests generating low <br /> concentrations of Cr(VI) Formation of Mn04" from soil manganese during ozonation is known to <br /> occur, and the ability of Mn04`to oxidize soil chromium is well-established <br /> Tests indicated that untreated soil can reduce Cr(VI) back to Cr(III) and that on a weight basis, the <br /> amount of Cr(VI)reduced is greater than the amount formed by oxidation Tests designed to quantify <br /> over time the ability of untreated soil to reduce any hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] that may be <br /> generated during the infection of peroxone indicated that hexavalent chromium generated by this <br /> iremedial technique will reduce back to Cr(III) within 27 days <br /> Gp.ysull)p)tpUgLlCamne pytlropm psmxtle•[hoalapY$mh of p.dl^]WZ g�lucak wm�ry>ae•+b <br />