My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006203
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PERSHING
>
4444
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540885
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2020 5:19:27 PM
Creation date
4/10/2020 2:44:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006203
RECORD_ID
PR0540885
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023381
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 73942
STREET_NUMBER
4444
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
PERSHING
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
11022017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4444 N PERSHING AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The analytical results for the samples are presented in boldface type in Table 1, along with <br /> previous data The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody documentation are included <br /> as Appendix B <br /> Detectable concentrations of TPH-g in the samples ranged from 120�cg/L (MW 1) to <br /> 130,000µg/L (V2) The concentration of TPH-g in the sample collected from MW8, located <br /> adjacent to the Shell service station and upgradient of the site, was 48,000 ,ug/L Detectable <br /> benzene concentrations ranged from 25 /,4g/l- (MW2) to 13,000,ug/L (V2) MTBE was detected <br /> in samples at concentrations ranging from 15 µg/L(MW4) to 900µg/L (RW 1) Groundwater <br /> sample analytical results are shown in Figure 1 <br /> 3. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM <br /> A vapor extraction system (VES) has been operating at the site since May 1994 The system <br /> P g Y Y <br /> extracts soil vapor from the vadose zone through seven wells (V I, V2, V4, MW2, MW3, MW5, <br /> and MW6) and destroys hydrocarbons with a catalytic oxidizer The system is augmented with <br /> air sparging equipment that injects air below the water table through sparging wells SW 1 and <br /> SW2 The oxidizer was converted from thermal to catalytic operation in May 1995, following a <br /> Isteady decline in extracted soil vapor concentrations, as shown in Tables 2 and 3 The decline in <br /> extracted soil vapor concentrations has continued since the conversion to catalytic operation <br /> During the fourth quarter, oxidizer influent samples contained TPH-g concentrations from <br /> 42 ,ug/L to below the method detection limit (mdI) of 5 ,ug/L, and benzene was detected from <br />' 0 78 4g/L to below the mdl of 0 050 ,ug/L <br /> In November and December, construction of a groundwater remediation system (UVB) was <br />' completed The VES system was shut down in December to allow the modification of the <br /> system manifold for the UVB system The UVB system consists of an in-situ air stripper <br /> groundwater recirculation well Recovery well RW3 was destroyed, and the groundwater <br />' recirculation well was installed in its place The recirculation well extracts groundwater at a <br /> maximum rate of 10 gpm from a 4-foot screen at the base of the well, and the water is pulled to <br /> the upper chamber where air is infected to volatilize petroleum hydrocarbons After the <br /> groundwater undergoes this treatment it is reinfected through the upper well screen into the <br /> formation <br />' 4. WORK PROPOSED FOR NEXTQ UARTER <br /> Groundwater elevations will be measured and groundwater samples will be collected in February <br /> 1997 The samples will be analyzed for TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE <br />' Because of the proximity of wells IW 1 and MW4, well P 1 is sampled only twice a year <br /> Similarly, because of the proximity of wells 1W 1 and RW2, well MW2 is sampled only twice a <br /> year On the same basis, well MW I is sampled only twice a year, because of its proximity to <br /> well P2 Because concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in wells MW 12 and MW 13 have <br />' wP61 73942Q 1196 TX 4 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.