Laserfiche WebLink
Well RW4 will extend the capture zone farther in the downgradient direction, but based on this <br /> well log, its maximum pumping rate will be much lower than that of RW 1, RW2, or RW3 <br />' Furthermore, well V1, which is completed as a recovery well, will produce little water because <br /> the saturated zone in this strata consists mostly of silty clay Well V 1 will be used to lower the <br />' water table in the area if it is necessary to expose hydrocarbons presently entrapped below the <br /> water table in order to remove them more easily using the soil vapor recovery system <br />' 1.4.3 Percolation Test <br />' Field Methods <br /> Also on 20 September 1990, an infection test was conducted in well MW7 in order to properly <br /> size an injection trench or to establish that a series of injection wells located along the western <br /> property line would be sufficient to generate a hydrogeologic mound, or barrier, to prevent <br /> hydrocarbons from an upgradient source (identified in MW8) from being pulled under the site <br />' Tap water was injected into well MW7 at the rate of 7 5 gpm for 155 minutes (2-1/2 hours) <br /> Water level measurements were recorded every 15 minutes during the test The results of well <br /> gauging in MW1 (drawdown vs time) were used to determine transmissivity of the saturated and <br />' unsaturated zones under the site. <br /> The computer program WHIP (Well Hydraulic Interpretation Program; Hydro-Geo Chem , Inc <br /> 1988) was used to interpret the data This program uses the Jacob-Cooper method for initial <br /> estimation of transmissivity and storativity; these values are then refined by iterative automatic <br />' parameter estimations (IPE) In the IPE, mean aquifer parameters are refined by using the <br /> Levenberg-Marquardt version of Newton's nonlinear iterative optimization algorithm <br /> tAnalysis <br />' The maximum sustained volume of water (Q) that can be injected into well MW 1 can be calcu- <br /> lated from the equation <br />' Q = K(hW 2- H02)/[0.733(log r./r")] (Driscoll 1986) <br /> where <br /> K = hydraulic conductivity 3 04 m/day, for saturated and unsaturated zone <br /> h = head above the bottom of aquifer while recharging (15 m) <br />' <br /> Ido = head above the bottom of aquifer when no pumping is taking place (6 1 m)r = radius of influence (-30 m [assumed]) <br /> r w = radius of injection well (0.127 m) <br /> For the assumed values of K and a 5-m "mound" (greater elevation) above the static water level <br /> in the well, about 310 m3/day (58 gpm) of water could be injected into the well. This might be <br /> adequate for the conditions encountered during the percolation test, when the sediment above the <br /> � W-Wf73%Ujul9th. 9 <br />