Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Most water quality parameters were not significantly affected by nitrogen, ozone, or peroxone <br /> treatment when compared to untreated groundwater Constituents that were affected were <br /> aluminum, arsenic, barium, bromide, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, vanadium, and <br /> hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] Of these, concentrations of arsenic, manganese, and nickel <br /> decreased after all three treatments Bromide decreased after treatment with ozone and peroxone <br /> When water that contains bromide is treated with ozone, a number of oxidation byproducts can <br /> be formed, including bromate Although the concentration of bromide decreased over time <br /> during testing, it does not appear that it was converted to bromate Bromate was not detected <br /> above the detection limit of 8 micrograms/liter(µg/L) in either the ozone or peroxone tests <br />' Aluminum, banum, molybdenum, vanadium, and Cr(VI) concentrations increased in <br /> groundwater samples in most cases The increase in aluminum concentrations occurred after the <br /> nitrogen and ozone tests (but not the peroxone test) for reasons that are unclear The increased <br /> level of aluminum remained below the California maximum contaminant level (MCL) The <br /> concentrations of molybdenum responded similarly to both nitrogen (an inert gas) and the <br /> oxidants, suggesting that the changes in concentrations were not due to oxidation There is no <br /> MCL for molybdenum Barium, vanadium, and Cr(VI) significantly changed only in the ozone <br /> and/or peroxone tests, indicating that the changes were due to oxidation Banum concentrations <br /> increased but to levels below the California MCL Vanadium concentrations increased to 350 <br /> µg/L, which exceeds the California State Action Level for Drinking Water of 50 tig/L There is <br /> no MCL for vanadium <br /> Treatment with ozone and peroxone generated Cr(VI), but tests indicated that the Cr(VI) should <br /> revert to the less toxic trivalent chromium [Cr(IIl)] upon exposure to untreated soil The amount <br /> of Cr(VI) produced vaned from <6 gg/L to a maximum of 570 µg/l, The cause of the <br /> variability is unknown, but probably is associated with the amount or concentration of applied <br /> ozone and/or the presence of manganese in the soil or groundwater When present, manganese <br /> appears to be oxidized into permanganate (Mn04-), which was present in all tests showing high <br /> Cr(VI) concentrations, but not in tests showing low concentrations of Cr(VI) Formation of <br /> Mn04 from soil manganese during ozonation is known to occur, and the ability of MnO4- to <br /> oxidize soil chromium is well-established <br /> Tests indicated that untreated soil can reduce Cr(VI) back to Cr(III) and that on a weight basis, <br /> the amount of Cr(VI) reduced is greater than the amount formed by oxidation Tests designed to <br /> quantify over time the ability of untreated soil to reduce any Cr(VI) that may be generated during <br /> the infection of peroxone indicated that Cr(VI) generated by this remedial technique will reduce <br />' back to Cr(III) within 27 days Some hydrocarbons were volatilized during the benchscale test <br /> As such, a soil vapor extraction system will be used to abate hydrocarbons or ozone in the <br /> vadose zone during the field pilot test <br /> 1.3 TEST OBJECTIVES <br /> IThe primary objectives of the proposed pilot test are to evaluate the effect of chemical oxidation <br /> on groundwater quality and assess the effectiveness of in situ chemical oxidation using ozone <br /> 1 <br /> G1Projects1739421MA5TER1WP1WPC7651Owne Injection Piot Tat Work Plan doc <br />' 3 <br />