Laserfiche WebLink
or portions of sites do not require further study and to <br /> encourage voluntary cleanup. Screening levels are defined as a <br /> level of contamination above which there may be enough concern to <br /> warrant site-specific study of risks. Levels of contamination <br /> above the screening level would NOT automatically require a <br /> removal action, nor designate a site as "contaminated. " <br /> The residential screening level for lead described in this <br /> directive has been calculated with the Agency's new Integrated <br /> Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model (IEUBK) model (Pub. # 9285.7-15- <br /> 2, PB93-963511) , using default parameters. As outlined in the <br /> Guidance Manual for the IEUBK Model for Lead in Children (Pub. # <br /> 9285.7-15-1, PB93-963510, February 1994) , this model was <br /> developed to: recognize the multimedia nature of lead exposures; <br /> incorporate irportant absorption and pharmacokinetic information; <br /> and allow the risk manager to consider the potential <br /> distributions of exposure and risk likely to occur at a site (the <br /> model goes beyond providing a single point estimate output) . For <br /> these reasons, this approach is judged to be superior to the more <br /> common method for assessing risks of non-cancer health effects <br /> which utilizes the reference dose (RfD) methodology. Both the <br /> Guidance Manual and the model are available to Superfund staff <br /> through the Superfund Document Center (703-603-8917) and to the <br /> public through the National Technical Information Service (703- <br /> 487-4650) . <br /> Residential preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for CERCLA <br /> remediations and media cleanup standards (MCSs) for RCRA <br /> corrective ,actions can b4= developed using the IEUBK model on a <br /> site-specific basis, where site data support modification of <br /> model default parameters. At some Superfund sites, using the <br /> IEUBK model with site-specific soil and dust characteristics, <br /> PRGs of more than twice the screening level have been identified. <br /> However, it is important to note that the model alone does not <br /> determine the cleanup levels required at a site. After <br /> considering other factors such as costs of remedial options, <br /> reliability of institutional controls, technical feasibility, <br /> and/or community acceptance, still higher cleanup levels may be <br /> selected. <br /> The implementation of this guidance is expected to provide <br /> for more consistent decisions across the country and improve the <br /> use of site-specific information for RCRA and CERCLA sites <br /> contaminated with lead. The implementation of this guidance will <br /> aid in determining when evaluation with the IEUBK model is <br /> appropriate and in assessing the likelihood that environmental <br /> lead poses a threat to the public. Use of the IEUBK model in the <br /> context of this guidance will allow risk managers to assess the <br />