Laserfiche WebLink
diesel (IPHg and TPHd, respectively), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX), <br /> halogenated volatile organic compounds (HVOCs), ethylene glycol, CAM 17 metals and total <br /> lead. <br /> The results of the Kaldveer investigation delineated three possible areas of contamination. "Area <br /> I", located in the vicinity of the workshop, had indications of surficial (less than 4.5 feet) <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. One sample collected in this area also had an elevated <br /> concentration of lead. "Area H" (located south of the work shop) and "Area III" (made up of <br /> three individual locations near the southern portion of the ROW acquisition area) had equivocal <br /> evidence of surficial petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination consisted of detectable levels of TRPH, +/-TPHd. It should be noted that TRPH <br /> was not detected in any of the samples collected from a depth of 4.5 feet. Detectable levels of <br /> "TPHd" were reported in nearly every sample analyzed, mostly at very low concentrations near <br /> the laboratory detection limit. The laboratory reports, however, indicated that all samples that <br /> contained detectable "TPHd" were "atypical of diesel fuel." The TPHd results in general are <br /> considered by Ground Zero to be highly suspect. TPHg and benzene.were not detected in any <br /> sample analyzed. The locations of the three areas are shown on Figure 2. <br /> Ethylene glycol was not detected in any sample analyzed. Very low levels of methylene chloride <br /> and trichlorofluoromethane ("Freon 11") were reported in a number of samples collected from <br /> the CalTrans ROW. The source of the reported methylene chloride was most likely in the <br /> laboratory. This compound is a widely used laboratory solvent and not uncommonly <br /> contaminates samples in the lab. The source of the Freon may possibly have been the laboratory <br /> as well. <br /> Apparently, CalTrans excavated and removed suspected contaminated soil from the ROW area. <br /> 6_0 Investigations by Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. <br /> 6.1 Soil Samplinb-February and March 1997 <br /> Ground Zero submitted a Workplan dated September 30, 1996 to San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD). The Workplan proposed focused <br /> and random soil sampling on the property as required by the Superior Court. Following <br /> consultation with PHS/EHD, a supplemental Workplan clarifying the locations of sampling <br /> points and suite of analyses was submitted to PHS/EHD on December 3, 1996. The Workplan <br /> was approved on December 16, 1996. <br /> On February 24 and 25, 1997, under the supervision of PHS/EHD, Ground Zero personnel <br /> obtained twenty three soil samples from eleven locations (A through K) on the property. <br /> Depending upon accessibility of location and depth, one or more of three sample collection <br /> methods was utilized: collection from excavated trench; collection from boring advanced by <br /> hand auger; collection from boring advanced by HSA drill rig. Sampling locations are shown <br /> wyskrq*tuksun=wy 3 <br />