My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
3570
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527444
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2020 4:47:33 PM
Creation date
4/10/2020 4:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0527444
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018586
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER ROY KNOLL TOWING
STREET_NUMBER
3570
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14339014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3570 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excluding the three samples analyzed by Argon in the area of impact the equivalent confidence <br /> intervals are: <br /> Total Lead: 45.24 :!5; <_ 78.76 ppm <br /> Soluble Lead:1.71 _< It S 5.79 ppm <br /> In either event the total lead concentrations within the impacted area do not exceed the Cal EPA <br /> Modified Residential PRG of 130 ppm. Accordingly, no significant risk to human health or the <br /> environment is posed by the impacted soil. <br /> 7.0 REMEDIAL ACTION GOALS <br /> The goals of the remedial action are to: <br /> • Prevent human exposure to any soil with concentrations of contaminants that might <br /> be expected to pose a significant health risk. <br /> • Prevent groundwater degradation by the leaching of any contaminants that have the <br /> solubility and mobility to impact groundwater. <br /> • Comply with applicable laws and regulations and the Judgement of the Court. <br /> 8.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> In Ground Zero's report Summary of Soil Contamination Investigations and Soil Remediation <br /> Plan (11/21/97) several remedial alternatives were evaluated. In the development of <br /> recommendations for remedial action, four options were considered: no action, paving, insitu <br /> treatment of soil, and soil excavation. These are discussed below. <br /> 8.1 No Action <br /> There would be no further work with this option. Insofar as the lead concentrations at the site <br /> do not exceed the PRG level, no significant health threat would be expected to result from this <br /> option. The lack of elevated lead concentrations in samples collected below 1.5 feet and the low <br /> solubility of the lead in water indicates that the lead is immobile and does not pose a threat to <br /> groundwater quality by leaching. The estimated cost of this option was $0. <br /> 8.2 Paving <br /> This option would involve paving the area from the northeastern portion of the property east of <br /> the line established by samples SS-2 and SS-3 southward along the eastern edge of the existing <br /> building to the vicinity of soil sample CC, or approximately 2,300 fe. <br /> MY$\reports\raw.Tt 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.