SU0013150 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 4 PC: 11-5-92 GP-92-12/ZR-92-14 3. The potential for the proposal to establish an undesirable, growth-inducing precedent. • This proposal may lead to requests both to enlarge the AL-5 area and to create other AL-5 zones In areas which have similar characteristics. 4. The effect of the proposal on the fiscal health of the County. • No effects on the fiscal health of the County attributable to this project have been Identified. The General Plan also contains implementation criteria for zone reclassifications, which are: 1. That additional land is needed for urban development • It does not appear that this criteria can be met. 2. That adequate services can be made available for the development permitted in the zone. • Private wells and septic systems and on-site retention ponds for storm drainage will service any further subdivision. AREkNEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: Public Opposition: One letter(see Attachment A) in opposition to these applications has been received in response to the referral of these applications. The San Joaquin Farm Bureau objects to San Joaquin County initiating a proposal which is of financial benefit to only one property owner while adversely impacting the agricultural area In response to this notification, one letter (see Attachment B) was received from an adjacent property owner requesting that their 20-acre parcel, immediately south of this application site, be included in the area to be amended and reclassified. At the time of Mr. and Mrs. Byington's application, four letters were received, three om neighboring property owners and one from the Farm Bureau. All expressed opposition t the proposal on the grounds of loss of agricultural land, fragmentation of land designated for agricultural use, and the potential disruption of agricultural practices in the area ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: An Initial Study was prepared for this project on October 14, 1992- On the basis of that review, no significant, adverse environmental impacts were identified, and a negative declaration was prepared. In addition, a Certificate of Fee Exemption with a 'De Minimis Impact Finding' has been prepared which states that the project could not have an adverse effect on wildlife resources. -9-