Laserfiche WebLink
5400-5606 Pacific Avenue -2 - 4 October 2004 <br /> Stockton, San Joaquin County <br /> contaminant distribution in deeper aquifer zones Also,there appears to be some recent plume movement • <br /> in shallow groundwater to the north and east of 5606 Pacific Avenue <br /> • By 15 November 2004, submit a geochenucal evaluation (GE)report signed by a geochemist,which <br /> compares the results of the soil and groundwater analyses, and thoroughly discusses the expected worst- ' <br /> case scenario reactions, i e , 100% conversion of constituents of concern into contaminants,reporting the <br /> chemical reactions in molar concentrations <br /> 1 If metals of concern(Cr6+,etc) are not detected,or general minerals (SO4, etc) are not present at <br /> levels favorable for adverse reactions in saturated soil,then submit a Pilot Study Workplan with the <br /> GE Report Note that all Pilot Study analytical detection limits must be sufficiently low to test the <br /> theories proposed in the GE Report and provide comparisons to Water Quality Objectives You will <br /> continue to monitor groundwater during the Pilot Study for the know petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> i contaminants and general parameters(dissolved oxygen,pH, specific conductance,temperature) <br /> 2 If metals of concern(Cr6+,etc) are detected,or numerals of concem(SO4,e£c)are detected at ' <br /> potentially harmful levels,then include a Workplan for a Bench Scale Test(BST)with the GE report <br /> j The BST should show which contaminant(s)are produced and whether the produced contaminant(s) <br /> i` will persist after termination of oxygen injection, using the graphed slope of the declining <br /> contaminants)concentrations versus time to calculate a decay rate(time to revert to non-detect) If a <br /> contaminant(s)is produced and persistent,provide that information in the BST report for my ' <br /> evaluation If contammant(s)produced are not persistent,provide Workplan for the Pilot Study with <br /> the BST Report containing modifications to the Pilot Study monitoring program, specifically,the <br /> frequency of analyses needed to confirm contaminant decay rates as calculated from BST analytical <br /> evidence • ' <br /> + By 15 December 2004,begin the Pilot Study During the Pilot Studyphase, groundwater sampling and <br /> analyses will be conducted, at a minimum,immediately before startup of the ozone injection system, and <br /> at intervals of one and 2 hours afterwards, in order to validate all contarninant(s) analyses and proposed <br /> decay rates, if applicable If a BST is not required prior to the Pilot Study,then, at a minimum, analyze <br /> at least once before and i hour after startup of ozone injection <br /> • Install automated data loggers in selected monitoring well(s) to record changes in dissolved oxygen, pH, <br /> specific conductance, and temperature during the Pilot Study The test data will be helpful to determine <br /> the effectiveness of ozone injection , <br /> You may c all me at(916)464-4615 for questions or additional information <br /> II <br /> AMES L BARTON,R G , <br /> ` Engineering Geologist <br /> cc Mr Mark Owens,UST Cleanup Fund, SWRCB, Sacramento <br /> M- Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division, Stockton <br /> Ms Jill Tracy, Esq ,UNOCAL,Brea <br /> Mr Ben Hennmgburg,ENSR International, Sacramento <br /> Mr Gary Hall GHH Environmental, Auburn <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />