Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Site Conceptual Model and Second Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Remediation Report <br /> Cleanup and Abatement Order No 5-00-707 EAI Project No 1232 <br /> i5.5 Analytical Testing Results <br /> 5 5 1 Units A and B Wells <br /> For Units A and B, similar or lower hydrocarbon concentrations were generally observed <br /> during this sampling event when compared to the prior quarters data Figure 14 summarizes <br /> the TPH-G, BTEX, and MTBE concentrations in ground water for the June 2002 ground water <br /> sampling event No MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, or EDB above laboratory reporting <br /> limits were detected in any of the ground water samples <br /> 5 5 2 Units C and.D Wells (MW-81),_MW-23S/D, and MW-24S/D) <br /> Similar or lower hydrocarbon concentrations were generally observed during this sampling <br /> event when compared to the prior quarters data The exception was well MW-24S where <br /> relatively higher concentrations of hydrocarbons were observed (see Table 1) <br /> Sparging of Units C and D will not be conducted at this time It is EAI's opinion that with time <br /> oxygen infected into Units A and B will diffuse downward to remediate the deeper zones <br /> 5 5 3 Well MW-9 and Other Perimeter Wells <br /> In September 2001 and December 2001, down gradient well MW-9 contained TPH-G at <br /> concentrations of 1,070 µg/L and 58 µg/L, respectively In March 2002, the TPH-G <br /> concentration in this well was below the detection limit of X50 µg/L In June 2002, this well <br /> contained 63 4g/L TPH-G These data indicate that well MW-9 is at or near the down gradient <br /> extent of the hydrocarbon plume at the Site <br /> Generally, hydrocarbon concentrations in lateral and down gradient wells MW-15, MW-14, <br />' MW-13, MW-18, MW-16, MW-27, MW-9, MW-5, and MW-7 are below or at the detection <br /> limits <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> i <br />' BI-N 1232RO211 -8- <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT, INC <br />