Laserfiche WebLink
00t. <br /> 1 " <br /> Mr James L Barton <br />' January 26, 2005 <br /> Page 2 <br /> tflow direction for Unit A was generally to the northeast, with a hydraulic gradient of approximately <br /> 0 004 feet per foot (fttft) <br />' Groundwater measurements recorded on October 18, 2004 from wells screened in Unit B were <br /> used to construct the groundwater elevation contour map included as Figure 4 The groundwater <br /> flow direction for Unit B was generally to the east, with a hydraulic gradient of approximately <br />' 0 006 ft/ft <br /> Groundwater measurements recorded on October 18, 2004 from wells screened in Unit D were <br />' used to construct the groundwater elevation contour map included as Figure 5 The groundwater <br /> flow direction for Unit D was generally to the east southeast, with a hydraulic gradient of <br /> approximately 0 001 ft/ft <br />' Copies of the groundwater sampling information sheets are included as Attachment B Tabular <br /> results of recent depth to water (DTW) measurements are summarized in Table 1 A tabular <br />' summary of well construction details is included as Attachment C <br /> Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Results <br /> • Groundwater samples were collected on October 19 through 22, 2004 Groundwater samples <br /> were submitted to California Laboratory Services (CLS) in Rancho Cordova, California, for <br /> analyses of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) by EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B Tabular results of recent <br /> groundwater sampling analytical results are summarized in Table 1 A summary of <br /> groundwater elevations measured to date is presented in Table 2 Cumulative groundwater <br /> sampling analytical results are summarized in Table 3 Maps depicting dissolved <br /> concentrations of TPHg and benzene in groundwater are included as Figure 6 through <br /> Figure 13 Laboratory analytical results with chain-of-custody documentation are included in <br /> Attachment D <br /> Redox Analytical Results <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW-2, MW-4, MW-7, MW-8D, MW-11, MW-14, <br /> MW-16, MW-27, MW-31, and MW-32 on December 17, 2004 Groundwater samples were <br /> submitted to CLS, for analyses of groundwater parameters related to intrinsic biodegradation, <br /> speckrcaiiy, Vo1lLefktratllJnJ of Iiltrates and sulfates by EPA Method 300, iron (II) by Standard <br /> Method 3500 Fe D, manganese (II) by EPA Method 2007, and methane EPA Method RK <br /> Selected wells were chosen due to their proximity to the axes approximating the plume <br /> centerline and along a transverse axes Tabular results of recent groundwater sampling <br /> analytical results are summarized in Table 4 The results were also plotted on radial redox <br /> diagrams as a visual aid in analyzing intrinsic degradation within the boundaries of and at the <br /> outer edges of the plume Figure 14 is a Site Map depicting radial redox diagrams for the <br /> selected wells The outermost data series on the diagrams represent the typical background <br /> J Trojects10694OW98-2931WorianglReports15098 4th Qtr 04-QMR doc <br /> r Celebrating 35 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services <br />