My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008002
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the IWL and ditches) are not fully preventing infiltration through the contaminated soil Vadose zone <br /> investigations should be considered If source areas near the IWL and ditches are located, then vadose <br /> zone removal actions should be considered (e g , SVE or co-metabolic bioventing) The ongoing <br /> investigations regarding other sources in the Industrial Area should continue and actions taken as <br /> appropriate to remove significant sources Source removal has the potential to shorten the required <br /> operational time for the ground water extraction system <br /> 4 2 1 2 Re-evaluation of Cleanup Criteria The RSE team supports the current re-evaluation of <br /> cleanup goals The consideration given to alternate cleanup goals of 20 µg/L (or higher) of TCE appears <br /> to make sense given the exposure potential at the site <br /> 4 2 2 Possible Component Changes' <br /> 4 2 2 1 Elimination of the Transfer Pumps Currently water is pumped from the extraction <br /> wells to the surge tank, and transfer pumps move water from the surge tank to the air stripping towers <br /> If there is enough head available from the extraction well pumps, and if an elevated or taller surge tank <br /> is installed, then it may be possible to feed the air strippers through gravity flow from the surge tank <br /> The savings in electricity from this change are estimated to be $7,000 per year This and the reduced <br /> maintenance would probably not offset the capital cost of modifying the piping and modifying or <br /> replacing the existing surge tank The volume of a new surge tank of the same diameter is approximately <br /> 208,000 gallons Using an order-of-magnitude parametric cost estimate, the estimated installed cost of <br /> the new tank would be $147,000 Thus, replacing the existing tank with an elevated or taller gravity--fed <br /> tank is probably not justified John Doe, Project Manager for XYZ, the operating contractor at the site, <br /> suggested that another alternative would be to totally bypass the surge tank and pump the water directly <br /> from the wells to the top of the air stripper This suggestion deserves further consideration if the <br /> influent flow rate is expected to remain fairly constant and the well pumps can provide the additional <br /> head This would eliminate the need for the transfer pumps, and could result in power and maintenance <br /> savings A new section of piping would have to be installed Also valves would have to be installed to <br /> allow the operator to either route the water directly to the strippers, or to route the water to the surge <br /> tank This may also require that a new system of interlocks be designed and installed The savings <br /> would be in reduced maintenance and power savings from reduced head loss The savings in power <br /> from reduced head loss would be at least the same as those from using an elevated or taller surge tank <br /> ($7,000) <br /> 4 2 2 2 Extraction Pump Longevity The rate at which the extraction pumps are failing at the <br /> site appears to be excessive and poses a significant maintenance cost The cause of the failures should <br /> be further investigated since there currently is inadequate data to determine the cause The motor design <br /> may be inappropriate for variable frequency drive controllers The alternating voltage as output by the <br /> controller may be too irregular in aaaition, the long Leads from controller to pumps may attow the <br /> development of overvoltages Recommend that the manufacturer of the controller be contacted <br /> regarding the problem as well as the motor manufacturer Analysts of the motor winding failure mode <br /> should be provided Furthermore, suggest that, for the pump motors running at or near full frequency, <br /> Technology is the general action or process in place at the site The technology is implemented by combinations of one or more components <br /> Several technologies can be used simuttaneously Examples include Ground Water Extraction Soil Vapor Extraction,Landfill Covers,etc <br /> Components are pieces of equipment facilities,or actions that serve a particular purpose to extract contain or treat the contaminants as part of <br /> an applied technology Examples include wells,piping,air strippers,carbon treatment,thermal treatment units a monitoring program treated <br /> water discharge,etc <br /> 06/07/99 <br /> Page 9 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.