SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1

Home Browse Search

12-01-1996 9:28Ph9 FROM RUSSELL F CHAPIN 209 4646947 P. 2 r-ffi .A anmoi® - - � - --- - 11 it DATE NOVEMBER 26, 1996 TO ANDY LUSH FROK RI.1S'SELLF.CHAPIN AS PER OUR PREVIOUS CONVERSATION CONCERNING THE SUCCESS OF OUR CLEANUP SITE WE HAVE REQUESTED A PRELIMINARY REPORT WHICH IS NOW OVERDUE_.IT IS MORE IMPORTANT SINCE T14E PRESENT SYSTEM IS NOT OPERATING CONTINUOUSLY WITH A SUBSTANTIAL LOSS OF OPERATING TIME EVEN THOUGH IT IS BEING INTENSELY MONITORED. rN ADDATION THE HIGH RATE OF OIL C:ONSUMMON AND frS COSTS OR NOT AMIMNABLE TO CONTINUOUSLY RUN TIME, AS TO THE REQUEST NVE ARE.EXPEC'T'ING, LISTED BELOW ARE SOME OF THE.DATA THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN T14E REPORT. HOURS OF OPPRATION Total run time and documentation of when the system was shut down.Why the system was shut down,and when the system was placed hack in service. We realize that poor equiPment or rest nse time to a doom system may significantly protract remediation. MASS EXTRACTION RATE The average flow rate and the average concentration ofthe vapor stream plotted an a daily basis_ Since mass extraction rates plotted on a daily basis allow estimates of other technologies which may be appropriate VAPOR CONC:EN J RATION ATTHE WELLIREAU Simc vapor cok)"ntxation at the wellhead is important and useful when negotiating with the agewy to close the site, SPECTATION OF THE INLET AND WELLHEAD VAPOR STREAMS We believe this speciation of the vapor stream is critical for fuel hydrocarbons site such as determining the need of additional wells and areas where hydrocarbons are being drawn from locations far removed from the targeted areaa such as the dirt tot across the street. WE HAVE EXPRESSED OUR CONCERNS MANY"TIMES THAT THE.SITE BE CLEANED UP TN A- REASONABLE TllvfF,, THUS FAIT OUR)1XPERLENCES AND THEIR SOLUTIONS HAVE CERTAINLY LOWERED OUR COMFORT LEVEL, SINCE TETE SITE CONDITION'S WERE WELL KNOWN THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR NOT DESIGNING A SYSTEM TO CLEAN UP THE SITE IN A