Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> groundwater monitoring data (March 1992) determined groundwater flow direction to the <br /> south. A detailed discussion of the initial subsurface investigation can be found in RESNA's <br /> 'Interim Problem Assessment Report, Soil and Groundwater Contamination, ' dated June 8, <br /> 1992 <br /> In July 1994, a RESNA field geologist observed the drilling of four additional groundwater <br /> monitoring wells (MW4, MW5, MW6, and MW7) at the site to further characterize subsurface <br /> conditions. Groundwater samples collected from these additional wells contained no detectable <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons. A detailed discussion of the Phase 2 Subsurface Investigation can be <br /> found in RESNA's "Summary Report, July 1994 Investigation, ' dated August 26, 1994. <br /> In a letter received from the PHS/EHO dated March 1995, permission was given to sample <br /> wells MW3 and MW5 and wells MW4, MW6 and MW7 on an alternating semi-annual basis <br /> Wells MW1 and MW2 were to be sampled every quarter, conditions permitting <br /> GROUNDWATER- MPL <br /> Smith Environmental personnel performed groundwater monitoring and sampling on January <br /> 51 1996. Due to bad weather, the fourth quarter 1995 quarterly monitoring and sampling was <br /> • delayed until January 5, 1996. Field work included measuring the depth-to-water in wells <br /> MW 1, MW2, MW3, MW4, MW5, MW6, and MW7; using an electronic water/product <br /> interface probe to determine if free product was present; purging and sampling wells MW1, <br /> MW3, and MW5, and subjectively evaluating collected water samples for the presence of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon constituents. <br /> j <br /> Static groundwater elevations were measured in each monitoring well on January 5, 1996 <br /> Groundwater exists at approximately 12 to 13 feet below grade A groundwater gradient map <br /> is presented in Figure 2 It depicts a southerly and easterly groundwater gradient at an average <br /> of 0.003 ft/ft or approximately 16 feet/mile. Fluid level measurements indicated groundwater <br /> flow direction beneath the site during the fourth quarter was different than the last monitoring <br /> event Groundwater flow direction beneath the site may be subject to seasonal fluctuations <br /> Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 1. <br /> On January 5, 1996, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW 1, MW3, <br /> and MW5. Samples were collected after stabilization of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and <br /> temperature All wells monitored were purged and sampled according to Smith <br /> Environmental's Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan on file with the PHS/EHD. A <br /> minimum of four casing volumes of water were removed from each sampled well Purge <br /> water was contained in labeled DOT approved 55 gallon drums and stored on site pending <br /> laboratory analysis and proper disposal. A dedicated disposable bailer was used to collect each <br /> ..'gnAXn.-,QR IM WC <br /> • <br /> SMTH <br />