My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005958
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545604
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 1:53:21 AM
Creation date
4/17/2020 3:15:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005958
RECORD_ID
PR0545604
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004000
FACILITY_NAME
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 31 October 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project'No 95-0113 <br />' Page 4 of 4 <br /> below surface grade Based on this condition the slotted interval of the monitoring well was <br /> I set between 20 and 40 feet However, during both sampling events, the water table was <br /> measured at approximately 15 to 16 feet bsg, which is indicative of a slow recharge aquifer <br />' However, purging activities prior to sampling effectively lowered the water table to within <br /> the slotted screen interval in the «ell Water from the surrounding formation would <br /> accumulate in the well casing, which was subsequently sampled, resulting in a semi- <br />' repiesentative sample Based on our experience at similar sites and under similar <br /> circumstances,if the ground water was impacted,hydrocarbons would still be detected,albeit <br /> at potentially lower concentrations The non-detection of hydrocarbons during two sampling <br />' events indicates that ground water has not been impacted <br /> • Based on the limited volume of the hydrocarbon-impacted soil remaining at the site and the <br /> apparent lack of giound water impact, the site should be considered for closure <br />' 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were mainly based <br /> upon analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the geologic <br />' conditions at the site have been made from a limited number of available data points (i e sampling <br /> points, monitoring well, etc), and subsurface conditions may vary away from these data points No <br /> other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional recommendations contained in <br />' this report <br /> f i <br /> J <br /> 1 n <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.