Laserfiche WebLink
`��-./ GROUP 5✓ERy'CES <br /> 10-foot sample from GP-1 indicated 2,900 mg/kg and the 10-foot sample from GP-9 <br /> ' indicated 140 mg/kg diesel range hydrocarbons Each of these samples was collected <br /> from the pea gravel present in the bottom of the former excavation No benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, or xylene (BTEX) compounds were detected in any of the soil samples and <br /> ' gasoline range hydrocarbons were only detected in the 10-foot sample from GP-9, at a <br /> concentration of 3 3 mg/kg <br />' Detectable concentrations of diesel and gasoline range hydrocarbons persist within the <br /> bounds of the former tank excavation and appeared to have migrated laterally up to 20 <br /> feet Diesel range hydrocarbons in the groundwater beneath this area ranged from 5 3 <br />' milligrams per liter(mg/1) to 330 mg/1 and gasoline range hydrocarbons ranged from 0 15 <br /> to 0 87 mg/l Concentrations of diesel range hydrocarbons fell off rapidly to levels below <br /> 10 mg/1 in the surrounding area Gasoline range hydrocarbons were not detected outside <br />' the area described above The limited migration of this material is likely due to the fine- <br /> grained nature, and related low permeability, of the soil at the site <br />' BTEX was not detected in groundwater samples collected outside the bounds of the <br /> former tank excavation The benzene concentrations in the groundwater beneath the <br /> former UST location showed a marked decrease from those reported at the time of the <br /> tank removal Benzene concentrations ranged to 8 6 micrograms per liter (lig/l), whereas, <br /> at the time of the tank removal, benzene was reported at 80 µg/1 <br /> Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) concentrations also showed a significant decrease <br /> from the 3,200 µg/l reported at the time of the tank removal to a maximum of 36 pg/l <br /> during the Kleinfelder sampling The bulk of the MTBE concentrations was present <br />' within the tank excavation and immediate vicinity and also did not appear to be migrating <br /> significantly <br />' The Learner Company forwarded the January 12, 2001 Kleinfelder, Inc report to the <br /> EHD on April 9, 2001 In addition to the work performed under the Assessment, The <br /> Learner Company evaluated public well information in the vicinity of 2711 Navy Drive <br />' and determined that no public wells existed within 2000 feet of the subject facility In <br /> addition, no vulnerability areas (potential threats to drinking water sources) were <br /> identified in the vicinity of the facility' The Department of Homeland Security has <br /> classified locations of water supply wells, however, it was recently confirmed that no <br /> water supply wells exist within 2,000 feet of the site <br />' On June 4, 2001, The Learner Company forwarded a letter and data package to the EHD <br /> that utilized the information contained in the Kleinfelder report to develop an estimate of <br /> the residual contaminant mass in the soil (see Appendix for a copy of this document) <br /> I Data source January 2001 search using lid /lgeotracker2 arsenaultlegg_com <br /> iz Telephone conversation between Mr Jeff Bennett of Clayton Group Services, Inc and Mr Dennis <br />' DeCoite of the Stockton Municipal Water District, May 27, 2004 <br /> 2 <br /> S\PwjM2263Trojec1 Summary and Request(or Closurc doc <br />