Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br /> delete the message from your computer. If you have received this message in error, please <br /> notify the sender by return mail. <br /> From: Jennifer Frase [EH] [mailto:jfrase@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:45 AM <br /> To: Cambridge, Keith <br /> Cc: Robert McClellon [EH]; Michael Kith [EH] <br /> Subject: Ameron <br /> Thanks, Keith. Yes, this lets me know what I'm looking for. Now, when I go out to this inspection, <br /> assuming they are still using the tires for hauling pipe and returning back to the site with more than <br /> nine tires on the trailer, is it going to be considered a violation? I know it is, but how would you <br /> suggest I handle it from that point?Will they still be able to qualify for beneficial re-use exemption if <br /> they apply? What sort of compliance date do they get? (30 days, 60 days..) <br /> Thanks for your input. <br /> Jenni <br /> From: Cambridge, Keith [mailto:KCambridge@ciwmb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 4:50 PM <br /> To: Jennifer Frase [EH] <br /> Subject: Bookl.xls <br /> Jenni: <br /> I have not received anything from them as far as hauling tires for use for their <br /> equipment. I ran their manifest and all, except 1, shows single tire transactions, not <br /> sure if they are truck or OTRs. Listed is what we have. The hauler is Wilson Way so <br /> we don't have copies of manifest in the system, you will have to get them from Wilson <br /> or the generator. <br /> Hope this helps <br /> Keith <br /> 9/4/2007 <br />