Laserfiche WebLink
21 October 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0592 p� <br /> Page 3 of 3 1� 1 <br /> Analytical results for the ground water samples for the August 2002 monitoring event are <br /> summarized on Tables 3 and 34 The laboratory report (MAI Lab IDs 0208518-001 through <br /> 0208518-004), QA/QC and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix B <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />' Based on the findings from this investigation, AGE concludes <br /> • Ground water at the site was inferred to be flowing toward the west at an average gradient <br />' of 0 011 ft/ft <br /> • The average ground water elevation at the site has decreased approximately 10 7 feet since <br />' the June 2002 monitoring event <br /> • Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground water appears to be limited to the area near <br />' monitoring well MW-1 None of the target analytes were detected in samples collected from <br /> MW-2, MW-3, MW-4 and DW-1 <br />' 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br />' Based on the findings of this and previous investigations, AGE recommends review of the site for <br /> closure considerations <br /> I <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br />' Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based upon <br />' analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluation ofthe hydrogeologic conditions <br /> at the site for the purpose of this investigation was made from a limited number of available data <br /> points(I e , monitoring wells and ground water samples) and subsurface conditions may vary away <br />' from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional <br /> interpretations, opinions and recommendations contained in this report <br /> I ` <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />