Laserfiche WebLink
h <br />' 26 November 2001 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 99-0592 <br /> Page 5of6 <br />' 33 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> A total of 9 soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, MTBE, EDB, 1,2-DCA and <br />' seven fuel oxygenates None of the analytes were detected at concentrations equal to or above <br /> laboratory reporting limits in any of the soil samples collected from the site <br />' Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 2 The laboratory reports(MAI Lab I D <br /> No 79942 through 79953), quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) report and chain-of- <br /> custody forms are included in Appendix E <br /> 3 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> f <br />' Monitoring well MW-1 was not sampled this quarter due to the lack of standing water in the well <br /> None of the target analytes were detected in sample DW-1 collected from the active domestic well <br />' Analytical results for the ground water samples for the September 2001 monitoring event are <br /> summarized on Tables 3 and 4 The laboratory report (MAI Lab ID 78832), QA/QC and chain-of- <br /> custody are included in Appendix F <br /> 1 <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the findings from this investigation, AGE concludes <br />' 0 Soil in the area of borings MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 is not Impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons or fuel oxygenating compounds The lateral and vertical extent of Impacted soil <br />' has been defined on the site <br /> • None of the target analytes were detected in sample DW-1 collected from the active domestic <br /> well <br />' 0 On 05 October 2001,the ground water at the site was inferred to be flowing to the southeast <br /> at an average gradient of 0 0001 feet/feet,although at such a low gradient small measurement <br />' errors can significantly affect the inferred flow direction <br /> Advanced GeoEnvtronmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />