Laserfiche WebLink
' 14 June 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 99-0592 <br />' Page 2 of 3 <br /> opened and water was allowed to run until the pump turned on The samples were transferred Into <br />' laboratory-supplied 40-mL EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 mL <br /> 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The sample containers were then labeled with the <br /> well designation, date, time and the sampler's Initials The samples were transported in a chilled <br />' container under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis The samples were analyzed <br /> for <br />' Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) In accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8015M, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8021 or EPA Method 8260B, and <br />' Fuel additives di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE), MTBE, tertiary <br /> amyl methyl ether(TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA),methanol, ethanol,`1,2-dibromoethane <br />' (EDB) and 1,2-dichloro ethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> 10 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 1 12 March 2004 Laboratory analysis of ground water samples were used to quantify the impact to <br /> ground water <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br />' On 12 March 2004, depth to ground water was measured between 61 70 feet and 62 41 feet below <br /> the top of the well casings, ground water elevations at the site ranged from 34 62 feet below mean <br />' sea level (MSL) in MW-1 to 35 40 feet below MSL in well MW-4 The ground water flow was <br /> directed toward the northeast with a hydraulic gradient calculated at approximately 0 0010 foot/foot <br />' Ground water elevation data from well MW-1 was not used to determine the gradient for the March <br /> monitoring event, this well is screened at a different Interval than wells MW-2 through MW-4 <br /> Depth to water and ground water elevations are summarized in Table 1 Monitoring data from MW- <br /> 2, MW-3 and MW-4 was combined with monitoring data collected from the adjacent Cherokee <br /> Truck Stop property to determine an approximate regional ground water flow direction Figures 3 <br /> and 4 illustrate the contoured ground water elevations <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />