Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran,REHS <br /> .� Environmental Health De artment <br /> p AssrsrANr DIRECTOR <br /> o Laurie CotWa, REHS <br /> r `' 600 East Main Street <br /> :A ' <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> �k Carl 8orgman, REHS <br /> Mike Huggins, REHS, RDI <br /> F p Website: www.Sjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 Robert MCCleflon, REHS <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 ,teff Carruesco, REHS, RDI <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> 19 June 2008 <br /> Messrs. Robert Trommer, CHG, and Kirk Larson, PG <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Division of Financial Assistance <br /> 1001 1 Street <br /> Sacramento CA 95814 <br /> Subject: Preliminary Five-Year Review Letters <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has' received and <br /> reviewed numerous preliminary five-year review letters each with your request to convey <br /> the EHD's agreement or disagreement with the site-specific recommendations. The EHD <br /> comments for a selection of those sites are provided herein, sites not noted in this letter <br /> will be addressed in the near future. Due to the high volume of preliminary five-year <br /> review letters and the ongoing workload and commitments of.the EHD, the following <br /> comments pertain only to the recommendations; other information in the five-year letters <br /> that is incorrect or incomplete is noted only insofar as that information directly affects the <br /> recommendations. <br /> 701 Charter Way, E. <br /> • The State Water Resources Control Board Cleanup Fund Five Year Review <br /> Committee (CUF) concurs with the EHD directive. to the Responsible Party (RP) <br /> to submit an interim remediation work plan and.to define contamination southeast <br /> of the site. The EHD agrees with this recommendation; the work plan is in <br /> preparation. <br /> 7500 111h Street, E. <br /> • CUF concurs with the EHD directive to the RP to. conduct additional remedial <br /> action north of the site to reduce hydrocarbon mass, which may include free- <br /> phase hydrocarbons. The END agrees with this recommendation. The consultant <br /> is attempting to get an access agreement with the owner of the property north of <br /> the site. <br /> 1600 Durham Ferry Road, W. <br /> • CUF stated that the EHD approved a work plan in January 2007 to conduct ORC <br /> application, soil vapor extraction (SVE) and ozone�jsparging (OS), and concurs <br /> with the EHD that active remediation should be implemented. to achieve Water <br /> Quality Objectives (WQOs) in a timely manner. Since the January 2007 approval,. <br /> ozone sparging has been ruled out due to the presence of dissolved hexavalent <br /> 5-Year Review Comment Letter 061908.doc <br /> ii <br />