My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRONTAGE
>
935
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545617
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2020 1:24:47 PM
Creation date
4/28/2020 12:51:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545617
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005557
FACILITY_NAME
RIPON FARM SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
935
STREET_NAME
FRONTAGE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
26102007/2011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
935 FRONTAGE RD
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County'; <br /> oPQ.�'N Environmental Health De a�rtment DIRECTOR <br /> ). _ ' .o Ik Donna Heran,REHS <br /> 600 East Main Street ;9 <br /> �. \ - :-ti PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 <br /> s Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> • Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RD! <br /> _ P�a Kasey Foley,REHS Website: www.sjgov.org/�hd� <br /> (209)468-3420 � <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 <br /> March 3, 2010 <br /> Mr. Allen Fetters <br /> Ripon Farm Service Incorporated <br /> 3705 Portsmouth Circle <br /> North Stockton, California 95219 <br /> Subject:Ripon Farm-Service Incorporated - <br /> 1 932 South Highway 99 (Formerly 22871 South Highway 99) <br /> Ripon, California 95366 <br /> Dear Mr. Fetters: <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed No Further <br /> Action Request (NFAR), dated November 1'0, 2009, and has :reevaluated data submitted in <br /> Vapor Intrusion Investigation Report, dated June 22, ''2009,, prepared and submitted by <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (AGE) on your behalf'.for the above-referenced site. The <br /> 1 NFAR was submitted in response to an EHD letter dated September 23, 2009, directing the <br /> submittal of a comprehensive site closure summary report based on results submitted in the <br /> Vapor Intrusion Investigation Report: <br /> The EHD seeks a technical justification for how data were entered into the Johnson and <br /> i Ettinger Model to determine the potential risk posed by soil gas, intrusion into buildings at the <br /> above-referenced site. AGE divided the carbon range of C6 to C12 for total petroleum <br /> ` hydrocarbons (TPH) quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) into three carbon number ranges (carbon <br /> ' number refers to the number of carbon-atoms in the hydrocarbon molecule): C6 to C8, C8 to <br /> C10, and C10 to C12. AGE also divided the highest concentration of TPH-g detected at this site <br /> in soil gas sample VP-1 [71,000 micrograms per cubic meter (pg1m3)]'by three to calculate the <br /> average concentration (23,600 pg/m3) for each of the three carbon number ranges. AGE did <br /> not provide a rational for dividing the maximum concentration detected in soil gas samples by <br /> three to determine a concentration for each of the carbon number ranges. The California <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (CRWQCBSFBR) has <br /> subdivided petroleum mixtures into gasolines, middle distillates, and residual fuels to establish <br /> Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). The CRWQCBSFBR has defined gasolines as <br /> having carbon ranges of C6 to C12, middle distillates as having carbon ranges of approximately <br /> C9 to C25, and residual fuels as- having carbon ranges between approximately C24 and Cao• <br /> THP-g was detected at 71,000 lag/m3, 64,000 pg/m3, and, 54,000 pg/m3 in the three soil gas <br /> samples VP-1, VP-2, and VP-3, respectively. Since these concentrations are well above the <br /> ESL of 29,000 pg/m3 for TPH-g in soil gas samples collected in shallow soil at commercial ? <br /> properties, you must provide a technical justification, supported.Eby authoritative guidance, for <br /> the methodology used to enter the above data into the Johnson and Ettinger Model. <br /> i _ _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.