My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
8200
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545621
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:57:04 PM
Creation date
4/28/2020 1:57:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545621
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003977
FACILITY_NAME
SPEEDY FOOD #2*
STREET_NUMBER
8200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8200 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jeff Won EH V <br /> To: jlane@groundzeroanalysis.com <br /> Cc: Jim Barton <br /> Subject: FW: Addendum to Monitoring Well Memo <br /> i <br /> Importance: High <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> DSCF0064.JPG DSCF0066.JPG U-31.pdf <br /> Hi John: <br /> First, thanks for the email. Two, this is a most urgent message and we have no time to <br /> waste: I need you to submit a work plan to have monitoring well #2 destroyed along with <br /> permit and fee by next Wednesday, February 16, 2005. I don't need an excessive work plan; � <br /> just one page and a map would do; even submittal by email. We need to have the well ! <br /> destroyed by February 25, 2005. <br /> There's not a moment to lose. Lori Duncan has just informed me that the highway revamp <br /> work in the area will begin in the month of March -- not March Lane as 1 had erroneously <br /> alluded to earlier on the phone. The responsibility now lies with us to destroy the <br /> monitoring well as soon as possible. City of Stockton nor Caltran would brother to <br /> destroy the well, and would be just as happy if they ended up paving over it. Leaving a j <br /> conduit where MTBE is still detected in the hundreds parts of billion is absolutely � <br /> unacceptable. We must move fast since they may soon be closing a portion of Foppiano <br /> beyond what's on the map to accommodate the construction vehicles, etc. <br /> I am forwarding you the whole email from Mark Thomas the survey company including the map <br /> and photos. Neither Lori nor I have been informed as to who is actually going to be I <br /> breaking earth, Mark Thomas, Parson Brinkerhoft, or any one of these consultants City of <br /> Stockton is dealing with. I will let you know as soon as I get more information. <br /> Your proposal for the SVE system in early April 2005 still is not really acceptable. I <br /> strongly request you to speak to the manufacturer and push for speeding up the date. <br /> Please let me know as soon as possible. <br /> I will send you an official letter regarding both matters following this email, and <br /> contact Frank and RWQCB today. f <br /> Jeff Wong <br /> -----Original Message----- -- <br /> From: Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:04 AM <br /> To: Jeff Wong [EH] G <br /> Subject: FW: Addendum to Monitoring Well Memo <br /> i <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Ken Doty [mailto: kdoty@markthomas.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:49 AM t <br /> To: Flatley, Martin Pat; Simon, Jim; Esenwein, Colt; Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Addendum to Monitoring Well Memo <br /> Hi Everyone <br /> First of all, Pat, Lori, and Colt you have been doing a great job on <br /> working out the issues concerning abandoning/removing monitoring wells <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.