Laserfiche WebLink
feasibility Study—Enhancement of <br /> Existing Remediation Activities <br /> 8200 N.Highway 99, Stockton, CA <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> 2.3 Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives <br /> Each of the alternatives presented above was evaluated according to the following criteria: <br /> 1. Implementation Issues <br /> 2. Effectiveness <br /> 3. Cost <br /> 4. Regulatory and Community Acceptance <br /> 2.3.1 Alternative l - Groundwater Extraction and Treatment <br /> X Criterion 1 —Implementation Issues: <br /> This alternative is feasible from a technical perspective. Access to the proposed extraction well <br /> location is not restricted. Subsurface and equipment infrastructure is already in place and a new <br /> extraction well can easily be tied into the existing system. Treated groundwater is currently <br /> discharged to the ground surface pursuant to Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) General <br /> Order No. R5-2003-004412 and the groundwater extracted from the proposed extraction <br /> well will be treated by the existing treatment system. Monitoring and reporting activities will <br /> follow the existing WDR. <br /> X Criterion 2 -Effectiveness: <br /> Extraction from EW2 has influenced the depth-to-water in MW 12 located approximately 15-feet <br /> upgradient of EW2. GZA proposes the installation of a new extraction well (EW3) <br /> approximately 15 and 20-feet upgradient of MW12 (Figure 3). The location would provide a <br /> small overlap of influence with EW2 as well as capturing contaminant migrating downgradient <br /> from the source area. Existing groundwater extraction and treatment activities appear to have <br /> been effective. The following summarizes the reductions of TPHg, benzene, and MTBE <br /> measured in EW 1 (Discussed in detail in GZAs Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and <br /> Treatment System Operational Report—April through June 2007 dated August 3, 2007): <br /> • October 29, 2003 — One week prior to extraction activities: TPHg (96,000 pg/L), benzene <br /> (9,700 pg/L), and MtBE(11,000 pg/L) <br /> • March 6, 2007 — Last sample event prior to air stripper malfunction: TPHg (5,600 pg/L), <br /> benzene(480 pg/L), and MtBE (520 pg/L.) <br /> o The results suggest a decrease in TPHg, benzene, and MtBE concentrations by one to <br /> two orders of magnitude. <br /> • June 27, 2007 — Most recent sampling event: TPHg (20,000 �tg/L), benzene (2,500 pg/L,), <br /> and MtBE (1,400 µg/L) <br /> o Chemicals of concern appear to have rebounded due to the absence of treatment for <br /> approximately 90 days. <br /> o Even with contaminant rebound, the results suggest a decrease in TPHg benzene, and <br /> MtBE constituents by 74%to 83% since groundwater treatment began. <br /> G:IGROUNDZEITULEBURG\Reports10709 F$rem enhancement.doc <br />