Laserfiche WebLink
• "� feasibility Study—Enhancement of <br /> Existing Remediation Activities <br /> 8200 N. Highway 99, Stockton, CA <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br /> X Criterion 4—Regulatory and Community Acceptance: <br /> This alternative should meet with public and regulatory acceptance if the bench scale and pilot <br /> tests indicate the system will be effective in reducing constituents of concern and not mobilize <br /> metals at the site. <br /> 3.0 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> Both groundwater extraction and chemical oxidation are technically feasible. Additional groundwater <br /> extraction is less expensive and can be implemented quickly upon approval of the proposed scope of <br /> work in the feasibility study. <br /> Both groundwater extraction and ISCO are expected to be effective within limits_ Groundwater <br /> extraction alone has a reasonable likelihood of achieving a measure of control over the groundwater <br /> plume in the area around MW 12. However, without eliminating the contaminant mass in the source <br /> area, the system would need to be operated for an open-ended period of time and the source area <br /> remediation activities may need to be enhanced. <br /> The goal of this feasibility study was to review the best option to enhance the remediation of the plume <br /> at and around MW 12. If confirmation soil borings indicate the remediation activities near the source <br /> area need to be enhanced as well, ISCO treatment can be reasonably expected to have a pronounced <br /> effect in reducing source-area contaminant mass. <br /> 4.4 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE FOR REMEDIATION <br /> GZA proposes to control the downgradient plume of contamination near MW 12 by installing an <br /> extraction well upgradient of MW12, enhancing the existing groundwater extraction and treatment <br /> system. The installation of an additional extraction well will be cost effective and can be implemented <br /> with great speed. <br /> Upon approval of the following scope of work, a well installation permit application will be submitted to <br /> EHD. The site will be cleared by Underground Services Alert at least 48 hours prior to any drilling or <br /> trenching activities. EHD and RWQCB will be notified at least 48 hours prior to any scheduled site <br /> activities. <br /> 4.1 Extraction Well Installation and Sampling <br /> A C-57 licensed drilling company will advance a soil boring at the approximate location shown on Figure <br /> 3 using a drill rig equipped with hollow stem augers. Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals <br /> to total depth of each boring for lithologic identification and field screening for contamination. Soil <br /> samples will be collected with a split spoon sampler containing clean brass or stainless steel liners. <br /> Samples selected for laboratory analysis will be capped, labeled for identification, and immediately placed <br /> in an ice-chest chilled to 4°C. <br /> G:\GROUNDZEITULEBURG\Reports10709 FS rem enhancement.doc <br />