Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC. <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon, California 95320 <br /> �Q <br /> Telephone: (209)838-9888 <br /> Facsimile: (209)838-9883 <br /> ICES <br />'f June 24,2005 <br /> Mr.Jeffrey Wong <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue,Third Floor <br /> Stockton,CA 95202 <br /> Subject: Work Plan to Evaluate Potential Effect of Water <br /> Supply I Well on Dissolved Contaminant Plume <br /> Speedy Mart,8200 N.Highway 99,Stockton,CA <br /> Dear.Mr.Wong: <br /> Enclosed is a work plan to present a proposed scope of work to evaluate the potential effect of pumping from the private <br /> domestic well(PDW)on the dissolved contaminant plume at the subject site. The work plan is submitted in response to <br /> your letter dated May 18,2005. Copies of the work plan have been submitted to Jim Barton of the Regional Board, <br /> Mr_ David trey of the San Joaquin County District Attorney's office,and to the responsible parties. <br /> Pursuant to your letter,the work plan is designed to evaluate the potential effect on the dissolved contaminant plume• <br /> from pumping groundwater from the PDW at a level substantially greater than current water usage. The rate and <br /> duration of pumping from the PDW was selected based in part on discussions with Mr. Barton of the Regional <br /> Board. <br /> Ground Zero would like to clarify other issues expressed in your letter. Our responses follow the italicized excerpts <br /> from your letter: <br /> In a meeting at San Joaquin District Attorney's office on November 30, 2004, EHD stated that the pump test as <br /> proposed in the November 12, 2004 work plan, which calls for pumping from .MW--13C screened from 202 to 222 <br /> feet below surface grade (bsg), at a rate of 3 gallons per minute (gpm)for 8 to 10 hours to test for hydraulic <br /> communication with the deeper PDW which draws from approximately 330 feet bsg, is not likely to work since there <br /> is a vertical distance of more than a hundred feet between the bottom of the MW-13C screen and the top of the <br /> screen on the private drinking water well. As proposed, water would have to move against gravity rather than with <br /> gravity as would be the case when the PDW is pumping. <br /> As you know,the purpose of pumping from a well is to induce the flow of groundwater against gravity to bring the <br /> water to the surface; many wells in the area pull water from depths far greater than 100 feet. Even so, a pumping i <br /> test does not measure the vertical or lateral movement of water in a well or an aquifer; a pump test measures the <br /> head of water(force)that causes water to flow through an aquifer toward the pumping well. If wells MW13C and <br /> the PDW are screened within the same homogeneous aquifer, then the induced head would theoretically be <br /> observable in either well,regardless of the depth of the pump setting. <br /> EHD suggested at the meeting that level loggers should be placed in nearby wells in all 3 zones to begin collecting , <br /> data T or 2 days before the pump test to characterize natural water level fluctuations, then pumping from the PD W <br /> at a moderate rate, and continue the DTW monitoring for 1 day after the pump test. <br /> I <br /> All of the above elements were included in the December 6,2004 work plan. j <br /> w I <br /> WPp1cstcvr_rev2.doc <br /> a <br /> ,f <br />