Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Jeff Wong <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> . Groundwater flowed in a northeasterly direction with an average gradient of 0 0014 ft/ft An apparent <br /> groundwater depression previously measured in well MW4 was not apparent in March 2002, probably <br /> due to the destruction of the old water supply well A potentiometric surface map generated using the <br /> March 20, 2002 monitoring data is presented on Figure 2 Groundwater monitoring data are <br /> summarized in Table 2 <br /> Monitoring wells MW2 through MW9B were purged of at least three well casing volumes prior to <br /> sampling Temperature, pH and electrical conductivity were measured during the purging process <br /> Samples were collected after the physical parameters stabilized and water levels in the wells recovered <br /> to at least 80% of their pre-purged levels Purged groundwater was contained in appropriately labeled <br /> DOT-approved 55-gallon drums in accordance with 49 CFR part 172 and 40 CFR part 262 <br /> Groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells were delivered under chain of custody <br /> protocol to Argon Laboratories (FLAP #2359) for analysis Field data sheets and purge logs are <br /> included in Attachment A <br /> 3.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the site were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg)using EPA 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX) using EPA <br /> 8020, and oxygenated gasoline additives, ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2- <br /> DCA)using EPA 8260B A copy of the laboratory reports are included in Attachment D <br /> The two groundwater samples collected from the old water supply well contained approximately <br /> equal concentrations of benzene and methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) Benzene was detected at 1 6 <br /> parts per billion and 1 3 ppb from depths of 90 feet and 200 feet, respectively, and MTBE was <br /> detected at 1,100 ppb and 1,200 ppb No other constituents of concern were detected above <br /> laboratory method detection limits The results suggest that no vertical chemical gradient existed in <br /> the static water within the well casing <br /> No gasoline constituents were detected in monitoring wells MW7, MW8, or MW9B Well MW 1 <br /> contained free product and was not sampled <br /> TPHg was detected in wells MW2, MW3, and MW4 at 2,100 ppb, 240 ppb, and 700 ppb, <br /> respectively Benzene was detected in wells MW2, MW3, MW4 and MW6 at 54 ppb, 2 0 ppb, 21 ppb <br /> and 2 2 ppb, respectively MTBE was detected in wells MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW6 at 740 ppb, <br /> 14,000 ppb, 24 ppb and 2,100 ppb, respectively Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were detected at <br /> relatively low levels in well MW2 Analytical results are summarized in Table 3 Laboratory <br /> reports and chain-of-custody documentation are included in Attachment D The estimated extents <br /> of benzene and MTBE in the shallow aquifer are presented on Figures 3 and 4, respectively <br /> 4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The measured free product in well MW 1 ranged from dust a sheen to a thickness of 0 03 feet during the <br /> reporting period Approximately 5 5 gallons of product/water mixture was removed from well MW 1 <br /> during the reporting period, bringing to 43 5 gallons the total volume of product/water mixture <br /> G\Data1GROUNDZEITULEBURGaeportslQMRV QM2002 doe <br />