Laserfiche WebLink
l� 1 <br /> Mr Jeff Wong <br /> June 26, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Prior to sampling, monitoring wells MW 1 through MW4 were purged of a minimum of three well <br /> casing volumes During the purging process the physical parameters of temperature, pH and electrical <br /> conductivity were measured Samples were collected after the physical parameters stabilized and water <br /> levels recovered to at least 801/o of their pre-purged levels Purged groundwater was contained in <br /> appropriately labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drums, which are currently being stored onsite Purge <br /> logs are included in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater samples were delivered under chain of custody protocol to Argon Laboratones (ELAP <br /> #2359)for analysis of TPHg by EPA method 8015 modified, BTEX by EPA method 8020, 1,2-DCA, <br /> EDB, and oxygenated gasoline additives by EPA method 8260B <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater samples collected from monitonng well MW 1, located within the former UST <br /> excavation, contained elevated levels of gasoline constituents Dissolved TPHg in groundwater <br /> collected from MW 1 was detected at 96,000 parts per billion (ppb), benzene was detected at <br /> 7,500 ppb, and MTBE was detected at 5,500 ppb Downgradient well MW3 contained TPHg at <br /> 1,100 ppb, benzene at 12 ppb, and MTBE at 2,800 ppb Upgradient well MW2 contained TPHg <br /> at 1,100 ppb and benzene at 11 ppb Downgradient well MW4 contained TPHg at 150 ppb and <br /> MTBE at 300 ppb No BTEX constituents were detected in well MW4, and no MTBE was <br /> . detected in well MW2 Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 <br /> Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are included in Attachment B <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater levels at the site rose an average of 3 86 feet since last monitored in October 1999 <br /> Elevated levels of dissolved gasoline constituents are present in wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 TPHg <br /> in groundwater ranged from 150 ppb in well MW4 to 96,000 ppb in well N1W1, benzene ranged from <br /> <0 5 ppb in well MW4 to 7,500 ppb in well MW 1, and MTBE ranged from <5 0 ppb in well MW2 to <br /> 5,500 ppb in well MW 1 <br /> Dissolved gasoline constituents in upgradient well MW2 generally decreased by 35% (TPHg) to 96% <br /> (ethylbenzene) since the initial sampling round in October 1999, including MTBE which decreased <br /> from 6 2 ppb to non-detect (<5 0 ppb) Dissolved contaminants in MW 1 (drilled through the former <br /> UST excavation) decreased by 20% (TPHg) to 87% (MTBE) Dissolved contaminants in <br /> downgradient wells MW3 and MW4 generally decreased by 861/6 to 99%, except for MTBE in well <br /> MW4 which rose from 52 ppb to 300 ppb MTBE in well MW3 decreased from 39,000 ppb to 2,800 <br /> ppb <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The lateral extent of dissolved groundwater contamination in the shallow aquifer beneath the site has <br /> not been defined, although concentrations in well MW4 suggest that this well is near the plume limits <br /> to the east <br /> F 1Data1GROUNDZF\TLTLEBLJRG\Reporb\2QM2000 doc <br />