My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005703
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
11396
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545624
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:50:32 PM
Creation date
4/29/2020 1:14:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005703
RECORD_ID
PR0545624
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003786
FACILITY_NAME
T&T TRUCKING INC
STREET_NUMBER
11396
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05926010
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
11396 N HWY 99 RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AIR TOXICS LTD. <br /> AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY <br /> LABORATORY NARRATIVE <br /> Modified TO-15 <br /> Brown and Caldwell <br /> Workorder#0605110 <br /> Two 3 Liter Tedlar Bag samples were received on May 04, 2006 The laboratory performed analysts via <br /> modified EPA Method TO-]5 using GC/MS in the full scan mode The method involves concentrating up to <br /> 0 2 liters of air The concentrated aliquot is then flash vaporized and swept through a water management <br /> system to remove water vapor Following dehumidification, the sample passes directly into the GC/MS for <br /> analysis <br /> Method modifications taken to run these samples are summarized in the below table Specific project <br /> requirements may over-ride the ATL modifications <br /> Requirement TO-15 ATL Modifications <br /> Daily CCV + 30%Difference </=30%Difference with two allowed out up to</A0%, <br /> flag and narrate outliers <br /> Sample collection media Summa canister ATL recommends use of summa canisters to insure data <br /> defensibility,but will report results from Tedlar bags at <br /> client request <br /> Method Detection Limit Follow 40CFR Pt 136 The MDL met all relevant requirements in Method TO-15 <br /> is App B (statistical MDL less than the LOQ) fhe concentration of <br /> the spiked replicate may have exceeded IOX the calculated <br /> MDL in some cases <br /> Receiving Notes <br /> There were no receiving discrepancies <br /> Analytical Notes <br /> All Quality Control Lunt failures and affected sample results are noted by flags Each flag is defined at the <br /> bottom of this Case Narrative and on each Sample Result Summary page Target compound non-detects in <br /> the samples that are associated with high bias in QC analyses have not been flagged <br /> The reported LCS for each daily batch has been derived from more than one analytical file <br /> Definition of Data Qualifying Flags <br /> Eight qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows <br /> B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit (background subtraction no <br /> performed) <br /> J - Estimated value <br /> E- Exceeds instrument calibration range <br /> S - Saturated peak <br /> Q - Exceeds quality control limits <br /> U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the reporting limit <br /> UJ- Non-detected compound associated with low bias in the CC V <br /> Page 2 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.