Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> r w <br /> 14800 W. Frontage Rd (Hwy. 99) - 3 - 4 September 1998 <br /> Manteca, San Joaquin County <br /> An off-site domestic well is to be installed at 14852 S. Hwy. 99, Manteca. The new well is being <br /> provided to replace the former domestic well, which has been impacted by contamination from the <br /> Moore Petroleum site. Based on discussions with Ms. Quynh Hoa of the State Water Resources Control <br /> Board (SWRCB), UST Cleanup Fund, the cost of installation of the off-site domestic well is to be <br /> reimbursed by the Cleanup Fund, pending Regional Board staff concurrence with site closure. <br /> APEX completed a fate and transport study for the site. The purpose of the study was to determine the <br /> potential impact to the on-site and off-site domestic wells. Based on the model, no contamination is <br /> projected to impact the new domestic wells for the 10 years period (1997 to 2006), that was modeled. <br /> The assumptions used in the model, although in some cases less conservative than they could have been, <br /> appear adequate, based on sampling data. <br /> Summary: <br /> Significant remedial activities have been completed at the site, bringing the TPHg and benzene <br /> concentrations to below laboratory reporting limits. Low concentrations of TPHd, MTBE, and 1,2-DCA <br /> remain in the soil and groundwater below the site. Contamination from the site has impacted two <br /> domestic wells, which have been, or will be replaced with new, deeper domestic wells. The cost of <br /> installation of the new domestic well at the 14852 S. Hwy. 99, is to be reimbursed by the SWRCB UST <br /> Cleanup Fund. Fate and transport modeling suggests that contamination from the site will not impact the <br /> new on-site domestic well, or the proposed off-site domestic well within the 10 year period modeled. <br /> The mass of contamination remaining in the soil and groundwater was calculated. Calculations were <br /> based on the assumption that if a contaminant was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit,then <br /> it was assumed to have zero concentration. The subsurface volume of impacted water was calculated, <br /> based on the groundwater sample concentrations. Mass and volume calculations and contaminant <br /> concentrations appear to be small, and the fate and transport model suggests that an impact to the <br /> domestic wells is unlikely. <br /> Based on the information reviewed, provided the data are accurate and representative of site conditions, <br /> concurrence with the SJCEHD determination for no further action appears appropriate. <br />